Essentially, this would see new “gene-edited” foods as distinct from old-fashioned “genetically modified” foods, and therefore not subject to the same rules and oversight.
In 2018 they published an article entitled, Mind control using sound waves? We ask a scientist how it works. Of course, it was scrubbed from their site, but thanks to the Wayback Machine we have the evidence of their technocratic depravity.
According to Matthew Maavak, Gaza is burning in lockstep with the Great Reset as Israel intends to replace the Islamic structures with a third Jewish temple.
Table of ContentsMalaise of the Islamic WorldTemple of...
According to Bloomberg, business and political leaders convening at the World Economic Forum's Davos event this month will look into the prospects for personal and business growth in psychedelic drugs. The House of Psychedelic reflects the architects of 'The Great Reset's' increasing interest in still-illegal narcotics.
In a report published on September 14 in connection with its ongoing 2022 Sustainable Development Impact Meetings, the World Economic Forum, led by German engineer and economist Klaus Schwab, cites compliance with COVID mandates to promote climate change lockdowns.
Alibaba Group President J. Michael Evans, when attending the World Economic Forum with the rest of the Davos elite, said that licking your plate clean will earn you 200 carbon credits in a new social compliance platform being tested in Chinese cities.
There appears to be a coordinated campaign by global elites to establish a new world order, largely by using technological advancements to develop an international, universal form of centralized governance. The G20 summit promotes international digital vaccine passports for future pandemics.
The covid-19 pandemic featured an unprecedented fusion of the interests of large and powerful corporations with the power of the state. Democratically elected politicians in many countries failed to represent the interests of their own citizens and uphold their own constitutions and charters of rights. Specifically, they supported lockdown measures, vaccine mandates, the suppression of a variety of early treatment options, the censorship of dissenting views, propaganda, interference in the private spheres of individuals, and the suspension of various forms of freedom. All of these policies and measures were centrally designed by the social engineers of the pandemic.
A role model? A country of zero freedom, low social mobility, social credit scores, and constant government surveillance? Who the heck, even among the revolutionary wokester crowd, is openly calling for a Chinese model for their own countries?
Coming from the word "quaranta" (which means "forty" in Italian), the idea of confining people for 40 days originated without the authorities really understanding what they wanted to contain. But the measures were one of the first forms of "institutional public health" that helped legitimatize the "accretion of power" by the modern state. This practice had no medical foundation; it was chosen for symbolic and religious reasons. This begs the question - are COVID-19 protocols based on science or religion?
