Two patients, one a Swiss national and other an Israeli have died just hours after being administered Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine shots. Authorities of both nations and the vaccine manufacturer however, have declared that the deaths have nothing to do with the vaccine.
In a shocking development, a nursing home resident in Switzerland who was among the first in the country to be vaccinated against COVID-19 died just 5 days later. Officials however, did not indicate whether the death was related to the vaccine, reported local Swiss news outlet Zeitpunkt.
“We are aware of the case,” an official in the canton of Lucerne told Reuters, adding that the matter has been referred to Swiss drugs regulator Swissmedic.
Similarly, in Israel, a 75-year-old man also died just hours after receiving a COVID-19 vaccination. Although, officials have declared that his death was from a heart attack and that it was unrelated to the vaccine.
The unidentified man got the Pfizer shot at 8:30 a.m. Monday, and within hours had lost consciousness and died at home in Beit She’an, the Jerusalem Post reported.
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
Israeli Health Ministry director-general Chezy Levy has launched an investigation. “We share in the grief of the family,” he said in a statement.
According to reports, the man was inoculated at around 8:30 a.m. at a Clalit Health Services clinic. He stayed at the facility, as is customary, for a short period of time to ensure he had no side effects. When he felt well, the clinic released him.
When Pfizer presented its safety data to the US FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in early December, it was found that two trial participants had died after receiving the vaccine.
In response to the report of those deaths, Israel’s Midaat Association said when vaccines are administered to at-risk populations, “there may be unfortunate cases. One should not infer from this about the safety of the vaccine, but welcome the transparency required from the pharma companies in the drug approval process.”
However, these assurances of transparency from the Pharma companies cannot be taken at face value. As GreatGameIndia reported earlier, the COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers have signed agreements with governments according to which they cannot be held responsible in case of any side-effects from the vaccine.
On top of that, the pharma companies including Pfizer has a history of intentionally lying to its customers about the harmful effects of its products and bribing officials to push these harmful products in the market.
The mainstream media has consciously suppressed the fact that COVID-19 vaccine maker Pfizer in 2009, had to pay $2.3 billion in the largest healthcare fraud settlement in history to resolve criminal and civil liability arising from the illegal promotion of certain pharmaceutical products.
Furthermore, a decade earlier these same pharma companies manufacturing the COVID-19 vaccines now were accused of faking a pandemic through the WHO.
In this controversial book renowned author Stuart Blume discloses that many of the most influential advisers, at both World Health Organisation (WHO) and national levels, are paid consultants to the vaccine industry – meaning that the WHO might be working for the vaccine industry’s interests and not the people.
In June 2009, the WHO declared the H1N1 outbreak to be a pandemic. This decision was based not on advice from its permanent vaccine advisory committee (known as the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts, or SAGE), but on the advice of an emergency committee, the names of whose members were not made public at the time.
In the summer of 2010 the WHO announced that the pandemic had ended. The virus had been far less deadly than experts had predicted. Estimates of how many people died from this HINI epidemic vary widely (from ten thousand to some hundreds of thousands) and have been disputed.
Millions of doses, which would be of no value in combatting a future influenza epidemic (and which some critics claimed had not been properly tested for safety) had to be destroyed.
Fierce debate followed, with critics claiming that the WHO had exaggerated the danger, spreading fear and confusion’ rather than ‘immediate information’. Committees of enquiry were appointed to investigate decision-making at the WHO and national levels.
On what basis, and on whose advice, are pandemics declared? On what basis and on whose advice national health authorities signed secret contracts with multinational vaccine manufacturers? Is it in the interest of the people or the interests of the pharma lobby?
For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage.