Pfizer COVID Vaccine Cause Severe Hangover, Headache And Pain In Volunteers

Volunteers face ‘severe hangover’, headache and pain after getting Pfizer COVID vaccine shot.

Pfizer COVID Vaccine Cause Severe Hangover, Headache And Pain In Volunteers
Pfizer COVID Vaccine Cause Severe Hangover, Headache And Pain In Volunteers

Around 43,500 people in six countries have taken part in the phase three trial run by the pharmaceutical giant and its partner BioNTech.

After Pfizer’s claim that the COVID-19 vaccine is more than 90% effective based on initial trial results, a few volunteers said that they suffered side effects comparable to a flu jab, with one comparing them to “a severe hangover”.

Around 43,500 people in six countries have taken part in the phase three trial run by the pharmaceutical giant and its partner BioNTech.

One of the volunteers of the trial, Texas lobbyist Glenn Deshields compared side effects of the shot as being similar to “a severe hangover” whereas another one, 45-year old Carrie said that she went through fever, body aches and headache after the second shot. 

Carrie also said that signing up for the trial was a “civic duty” and said Monday’s positive news left her feeling “very proud”.She said that ‘There are so many people who have had it and suffered.’She had received her first shot back in September and her second last month.

Pfizer and German partner BioNTech said they had found no serious safety concerns yet and expected to seek U.S. emergency use authorization this month, raising the chance of a regulatory decision as soon as December.

If granted, the companies estimate they can roll out up to 50 million doses this year, enough to protect 25 million people, and then produce up to 1.3 billion doses in 2021.

The Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine uses messenger RNA (mRNA) technology, which relies on synthetic genes that can be generated and manufactured in weeks and produced at scale more rapidly than conventional vaccines. The technology is designed to trigger an immune response without using pathogens, such as actual virus particles.

Meanwhile, a volunteer died during trial of COVID-19 vaccine developed by AstraZeneca and Oxford University.

Earlier, drug giant AstraZeneca had stopped global trials of its coronavirus vaccine after it caused a mysterious illness in one of the volunteers. The company said it is investigating the cause of the unexplained illness but did not say who had stopped the trial. The mysterious illness is reported to be an inflammatory syndrome known as transverse myelitis which may lead to paralysis.

There is a lot of unrest and distrust among people with regards to the COVID-19 vaccine and regulators and companies alike have been working to ensure people trust in the vaccine authorization process.

However, as reported by GreatGameIndia earlier, a senior managerial executive of AstraZeneca has revealed in shocking details that the company could not be on the receiving end of any constitutional motion or face legal action for any possible side effects or unwanted reactions induced by its Covid-19 vaccine.

The company has agreements with governments as per which AstraZeneca cannot be held responsible for any side-effects of the vaccine and those affected will have no legal recourse.

AstraZeneca has been granted protection from future product liability claims related to its COVID-19 vaccine by most of the countries with which it has struck supply agreements.

For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage.

(With inputs from agencies)

Do you have a tip or sensitive material to share with GGI? Are you a journalist, researcher or independent blogger and want to write for us? You can reach us at [email protected].

12 Responses

  1. On this day the Greek Government announced forced vaccinations with this vaccine for all Greek citizens immediately within 30 days throughout Greece based on lists for the order in which it will be imposed. HOW DO WE STOP THEM?

  2. With Logic. What purpose does the vaccine serve? It only protects the vaccinated individual. It does not affect transmission. It doesn’t change how easily the virus will be spread to other people or vice versa. On top of that , you’re more likely to get struck by lightning than to die from this virus if you’re under 70. Not a risk that normal people should even have in their mind. Therefore , since the vaccine is only a precautionary tool for a possible health issue pertaining to the individual patient , it most certainly violates human rights law , basic morals , and common sense , to force it upon anyone. It is the choice of the individual if they put something in their body, especially an injection , and only after sufficient time to review and study the vaccine itself, with all information made available. I believe this can be defended in court.

  3. Connect with friends and family and neighbours to create an organised response to reject the vaccine. Boycott or avoid Google, YouTube, Instagram, Twitter, Facebook and Google Pay etc. Use other video apps and communication apps. Don’t pay for things digitally. Avoid Amazon. Get off hotmail and gmail. Start planting vegetables and storing seed from veggies and fruit that you buy. Make friends with local farmers. Create a network with farmers that supports them and your community with as little exchange of cash as possible. Offer to do the tractor work personaĺly for example. Do the weeding by hand. So the farmer does not need to pay for pesticides and fuel and tractor repairs etc. Try to continue your job from home if possible but be ready to say no to your job if the new vaccine or a flu vaccine is going to forced on you. If the police or army is brought in to vaccinate everyone be ready with six months worth of food you can store. Resist. Say no. Prepare legal documents for you and your network of people to support your refusal to be vaccinated. Apply to your supreme/federal court. Base your legal argument on how the WHO’s definition of what constitutes a pandemic is currently flawed (the WHO changed the definition of a pandemic in May 2009) and refer to your government laws and protocols that accept this flawed definition. It is likely that this 2009 definition is what gives your government the power to force vaccinations and enforce lockdowns.

  4. “It only protects the vaccinated individual.” Yes, but only according to medicine’s own scientific dogma. The fact that over $4 billion has been paid out by vaccine courts for injury and death caused by these experimental lab concoctions tells a different story. Using the government’s own conclusion that only 1% of all vaccine injuries are reported, the $4 billion is just the tip of the iceberg.

    “The greatest threat of childhood diseases lies in the dangerous and ineffectual efforts made to prevent them through mass immunization. There is no convincing scientific evidence that mass inoculations can be credited with eliminating any childhood disease.” – Dr. Robert Mendelsohn, MD

    “The vaccinations are not working, and they are dangerous. We should be working with nature.” – Lendon Smith MD

    “The only safe vaccine is a vaccine that is never used.” – Dr. James A. Shannon, National Institutes of Health

    “No batch of vaccine can be proved safe before it is given to children.” – Surgeon General of the United States Leonard Scheele, addressing an AMA convention in 1955.

    “There is a great deal of evidence to prove that immunization of children does more harm than good.” – Dr. J. Anthony Morris, formerly Chief Vaccine Control Officer at the FDA

  5. The problem is that for ever 1 doctor that makes a claim against vaccinations , there are probably 100 others (at least) that support it. You’d need convincing evidence to get the masses to oppose a vaccination, not minority testimony/opinion. So you’d have to uncover hidden adverse affects or evidence of a conspiracy to use the vaccine as a vehicle for other purposes. And even then you’d need a campaign to frame the presentation of that info to cleverly avoid attack from mainstream media. The only real tangible defense that’s widely accessible is the court system and human rights, moral arguments. Like “On what grounds does this treatment qualify for a widespread mandate if benefit is isolated to the individual patient and does not make the virus any less transmissible?” They might argue that being vaccinated prevents infection and therefore viral load, which reduces the total contagiousness and duration of contagiousness of the individual… which is why I worded the question a specific way. Now , it could be argued that the only people needing a vaccine are the most at-risk (elderly with pre-existing) and that would reduce the death count to a negligible level and also give time for everyone to observe the people treated for anything unusual….. provided they are given the “real” vaccine and not something other than whats intended for the masses. Also it would be effective to have the people most involved in the vaccine program to testify on record about the intentions and the safety of the vaccine, knowing there’s a severe punishment created specifically for them if it’s discovered that they withheld information pertaining to the purpose or effect of the vaccine.

  6. Those 100 haven’t done the research and wouldn’t want to know because that’s the end of their career, they’d rather just keep getting their kickbacks for every jab given. The 1 that does the research and speaks up has nothing to gain but everything to lose even when the evidence they provide is clear. I’d take the advice of that 1 over the 100 every time. Vaccines are inherently unsafe which is why all manufacturers are protected from lawsuits., if they were so safe, why did they demand protection back in 1986? The covid vaccine about to be mass produced in Australia also came with a bill being passed, offering manufacturer immunity from lawsuits…

  7. I think I figured it out.. The 2’nd Wave will be from autotoxemia from wearing the mask…Most people dying in 1919 epidemic died of infectious pneumonia from the masks..

Leave a Reply