Activists are charging UK officials and the world’s most powerful health figures like Bill Gates and Dr Fauci with crimes against humanity and genocide, citing a range of statistics on the effects of COVID “vaccines” and policies.
One group including Dr. Michael Yeadon, former Vice President of Pfizer, filed a complaint (read below) representing British citizens in the International Criminal Court (ICC) against the likes of Boris Johnson and British officials, Bill and Melinda Gates, directors of large pharmaceutical companies, World Economic Forum executive chairman Klaus Schwab, and others charging them with crimes against humanity.
The group based in the UK, which includes an astrophysicist and a funeral director amongst their ranks, also charged Dr. Anthony Fauci; Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization (WHO); June Raine, chief executive of Medicines and Healthcare products regulatory agency (MHRA); Dr. Radiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation; and Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, as “responsible for numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code … war crimes and crimes of aggression” in the UK and several other countries.
After repeating their unsuccessful attempt to bring their case to a UK court, the petitioners started calling with “the utmost urgency” for the ICC “to stop the rollout of COVID vaccinations, introduction of unlawful vaccination passports and all other types of illegal warfare … being waged against the people of the UK.”
Among the group’s complaint filed on the 6th of December, they provide evidence that the “vaccines” were in fact nothing but gene therapies that were a product of engineering with gain-of-function research from bat coronaviruses. They further argued that these “vaccines” have resulted in widespread death and injury, but the UK government had failed in investigating these cases of reported deaths and injuries.
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
Several other arguments made by them included the claim that the COVID statistics including the death numbers were inflated; the face masks posed several risks such as hypoxia, hypercapnia and other causes; and that the PCR tests were “completely unreliable” and “contain carcinogenic ethylene oxide.”
Additionally, they argued that effective treatments for Covid-19 including hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were suppressed and resulted in more COVID-19 mortality than there should have been.
They claim the lockdowns were created on the pretext of artificially inflated infections and deaths from a genetically engineered virus, as well as experimental “vaccines” that led to the following results:
Serious short-term injuries and deaths with at least 395,049 extreme side effects reported from COVID “vaccines” in the UK alone; sharp increase in calls into ChildLine from vulnerable children during lockdowns; “destruction of wealth and businesses” through imposed lockdowns;” “severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law,” which contained travel bans and bans on gathering, and compelled quarantine and self-isolation; the segregation akin to apartheid due to implementation of the vaccine passport system; and “expected reduction in fertility” post “vaccination,” amongst various other detrimental physical and psychological effects.
Additionally, the applicants are adamant on their claim that “the suppression of safe and effective alternative treatments for Covid-19 amounts to murder and warrants a full investigation by the court.”
They found that in addition to censoring and promoting information about these alternative treatments on the internet, “some academic journals are blocking the publication of studies showing the effectiveness of drugs such as ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine.”
Applicants also cited quotes from Holocaust survivors who portray “stark parallels between Covid restrictions and the beginning of the Holocaust.” In an open letter addressed to the medical regulatory authorities, the survivors of Holocaust have asked them to “stop this ungodly medical experiment on humankind immediately,” which they assert is in the violation of the Nuremberg Code.
They even claim that “another holocaust of greater magnitude is taking place before our eyes.” One of the survivors, Vera Sharav, said in an interview mentioned in the complaint:
“The stark lesson of the Holocaust is that whenever doctors join forces with government and deviate from their personal, professional, clinical commitment to do no harm to the individual, medicine can then be perverted from a healing, humanitarian profession to a murderous apparatus.”
“What sets the Holocaust apart from all other mass genocides is the pivotal role played by the medical establishment, the entire medical establishment. Every step of the murderous process was endorsed by the academic, professional medical establishment. Medical doctors and prestigious medical societies and institutions lent the veneer of legitimacy to infanticide, mass murder of civilians.”
According to the complaining applicants, all harmful effects of “vaccines”, quarantines and viruses meet the criteria of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes against the British people, because of the perpetrators “members of the UK government and world leaders have both knowledge and intent with respect to these alleged crimes.”
They even argue that the destructive effects of “vaccines”, shutdowns, and engineered viruses are deliberate attempts to reduce population and destabilize social stability as part of a coordinated global program to consolidate wealth and power in the hands of the very few and fortunate.
They proceed to engage in the debate that these acts are therefore a “crime of aggression”, which is, an attempt “effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of a State.” In this case, they claim, the goal is to “dismantl[e] all the Democratic Nation States, step by step,” and to “destroy small and medium sized businesses, moving the market shares to the largest corporations,” held by the ultra-rich, so as to give this specific “elite” group considerably greater monetary and political control.
Read the court complaint below: