Following the Portuguese, German and Dutch rulings, now the Austrian court has ruled that PCR tests are not suitable for COVID-19 diagnosis and that lockdowns has no legal or scientific basis.
Must Watch: Putin offers Nuclear Weapons to Everyone
The Vienna Administrative Court granted a complaint by the FPÖ against the prohibition of its meeting registered for January 31 in Vienna.
“The prohibition was wrong,” the court said says in the ruling (read judgement below).
The court stated on the basis of scientific studies that the grounds for the prohibition put forward by the Vienna State Police Department are completely unfounded.
The court agrees with the statements in the complaint “on all points” and even goes far beyond the arguments put forward by the FPÖ itself.
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
In particular, the criteria and definitions used to determine the number of corona infections are being massively questioned.
It is expressly pointed out that, even according to the World Health Organization (which took a u-turn only after Biden took office), “a PCR test is not suitable for diagnosis and therefore does not in itself say anything about the disease or infection of a person”.
“However, the Minister of Health uses a completely different, much broader case definition for Covid-19 diagnosis, which cannot be used to justify the prohibition of a meeting.”
The court came to the conclusion that the “information” from the Vienna City Health Service, on which the prohibition by the Vienna State Police Department was based, “did not contain any valid and evidence-based statements or findings on the pandemic”.
Based on the definitions of the Minister of Health, “Case definition Covid-19” from December 23, 2020, a “confirmed case”
- is any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-2-specific nucleic acid (PCR test), regardless of clinical manifestation or
- any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the clinical criteria or
- any person with evidence of SARS-CoV-specific antigen that meets the epidemiological criteria.
Thus none of the three “confirmed cases” defined by the Minister of Health meets the requirements of the WHO concept of “sick / infected person”. The WHO refuses to rely solely on the PCR test (confirmed case 1).
Below is the Austrian court judgement translated into English.
Worldwide Action on Scamdemic
In a similar ruling, a Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.
A German court in a landmark ruling has declared that COVID-19 lockdowns imposed by the government are unconstitutional.
Thuringia’s spring lockdown was a “catastrophically wrong political decision with dramatic consequences for almost all areas of people’s lives,” the court said, justifying its decision.
It was then revealed that the German Interior Ministry hired scientists to develop fake coronavirus model in order to justify strict lockdown, according to extensive email exchanges obtained by a group of lawyers in a legal dispute.
Earlier, an American federal judge ruled coronavirus restrictions in Pennsylvania as unconstitutional.
Even the Hague Court has ruled that the COVID-19 lockdown which was imposed by the Dutch Govt had no legal basis and that it was illegal.
However, the Dutch appeals court oveturned the ruling within hours which ordered the government to lift the “illegitimate” measure immediately.
The appeals judges argued that they wanted to avoid what they called a “yo-yo effect,” referring to public confusion around whether the curfew was still in force.
Last year, an Italian politician had demanded arrest of Bill Gates in the Italian Parliament.
Sara Cunial, MP for Rome denounced Bill Gates as “Vaccine Criminal” and urged Italian President to hand him over to the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity.
Then an Austrian parliamentary member exposed the defectiveness of the government’s COVID-19 tests by demonstrating in the parliament how a glass of Coca Cola tested positive for COVID-19.
Earlier, the Tanzanian President John Magufuli growing suspicious of the World Health Organization (WHO), decided to investigate the claims of the tests himself. He sent the WHO samples of a goat, a papaya and a quail for testing, all of which came COVID-19 positive.
Magufuli was known as “The Bulldozer” for his tough stance against corruption and for his hardline policies, which helped him to victory in October 2015 as Tanzania’s fifth president.
The European Union gave 27 million euros to Tanzania to impose COVID-19 measures prescribed by the WHO like strict lockdowns, masks and mass-scale vaccination.
Tanzania took the money, then declared the country coronavirus free. This led to the Europeans venting their anger in the parliament.
His sudden death has raised many questions including whether Tanzania’s President was assassinated for exposing the COVID-19 plandemic by taking controversial action against Big Pharma and the WHO and their global push for vaccines.
Because of such massive COVID-19 false positive cases scandal, the Australian Government has scrapped a billion dollar coronavirus vaccine agreement with Australian biotech company CSL Limited to supply 51 million doses of a Covid-19 vaccine being developed by the University of Queensland after several trial participants returned false positive HIV test results.
Even the Belgian health experts have demanded an investigation into the WHO for faking a pandemic.
In the past in 2010, the WHO was caught faking a pandemic and was forced to admit that its methodology of measuring the virality or the spread of the disease, instead of its severity was incorrect.
It was also revealed in an intercepted human intelligence report that Bill Gates offered $10 million bribe for a forced Coronavirus vaccination program in Nigeria
As reported by GreatGameIndia last year, the President of Belarus had exposed that the World Bank coronavirus aid comes with conditions for imposing extreme lockdown measures, to model their coronavirus response on that of Italy and even changes in the economic policies which he refused as being “unacceptable”.
A major lawsuit has also been filed against the PM of Denmark for strict COVID-19 restrictions and for killing almost 17 million minks.
A three judge court in Peru has ruled that the COVID-19 pandemic was started by the billionaires Bill Gates, George Soros and Rockefeller.
Despite the ruling (read the resolution in full at above link), “fact-checkers” concluded that the Peruvian court had no evidence to make such a judgement citing declaration from the WHO and CDC who have lost all its credibility.
For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage.
Send in your tips and submissions by writing to us directly. Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates.
From the manifest beginning of the entire sovereign crime in 2019 originated in UK government and Gates Foundation which was meticulously planned with World Economic Forum’s top and pharmaceutical and medical communities since probably around 2009, to the current situation in April 2021, the illogism of this plandemic has been evident. I’m expecting next court decisions that incriminate UK government and Gates Foundation as sovereign crime complots.
Can you please reduce your ads popping up all the time?? Who can read your page in such an annoying manner?
dear GGI, i don’t seem to be able to find any news on mentioned Dutch lawsuits on the PCR tests over here in the Netherlands, which i find strange. would you please be so kind to add a link in the article to help me out ? the link in the article that mentions a Dutch lawsuit is about the Dutch lock-down being illegal, but that’s not related to PCR tests..!
many thanks, and please stay safe !!!
Excellent to see courts in many countries challenging the mainstream narrative.
The PCR test was declared to be inaccurate for the purpose of determining the cause of a person’s illness and whether the person is infectious or not by its inventor Kary Mullis.
Thank you for great and important info. Not so many newssite telling the truth anymore..
Is there a reason why all of your sources link back to your own journal? Are there not external sources that support your “findings”? All of this just seems like really poorly intertwined bullshit. Good try.
This is normal practice to get you own website higher in the searchresult. Many sites does that. If you go to one of the pages they link to from this site you will se there is several links out to sources. So next time try to examine a little better before criticising?
ex: this page https://greatgameindia.com/tanzania-27-million-eu-coronavirus-free/
is linking to BBC, Africanews.com Twitter feeds videos, what have you..
Can’t verify this information anywhere? Where is the original source of this?
To debate the count of voting system, miss the principle of that dominion
Take from Peter, give to Paul, indian giver after all. What’s good for the goose, and for the gander to tell, story of two fathers , rumming to make space, other filling ships in a small placeS, islandS orleans, common house sparrow nest,off debate
Drunk on rum smugglers run, clause22 derived, whitepaper , of the bust BY the DEN, in our common house, 49er you , but it by the Conference, unclear view, 10 point one ten.2
Perhaps 47 in dia used! 49 privy boy and again 82 7yr uncleared for you, and a
belaUckon Russ 2to1 margin on you
To understand who! Peter is , truE h20 nature’s lubricant, but lost in translation in TRUTHe father INFORMANTly to you, means the son is about to do
America make Better DUCK cover chief Inspector brenda Clues’eau VAGerald
Eskimo Pink panther, eskimockamentary
PS Don’t stand up, wet from aquaDUCT
Shock that comes from overtop
(Hydro Electric Labrador Project) irma blast again, waters so cold every lebron Joey smallwood, no matter how proud stood
Labrador Eskimo help
LEO! St. Pierre smugglers run
Peter’s rum is where #pierreois
Sent from my Galaxy