During an interview with the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Fauci admitted he made up COVID guidelines based on mere assumptions, not science. Former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases director Dr. Anthony Fauci has acknowledged that some of the strictest COVID-19 recommendations, such as social separation
Australian blogger Jo Nova recently revealed the dark side of science, exposing 11,000 “peer-reviewed” papers in the 217-year-old Wiley science publication as fakes. It serves as another example of why it might not always be the wisest course of action to ‘trust the science’ blindly in the future. It has
Global Innovation Index 2023 reveals the top 50 Science and Technology Hubs. The United States leads global research and development spending, followed by China, Japan, Germany, and South Korea. Another wave of science and technology (S&T) innovation swept the globe in 2023, with the launch of the first OTC birth
According to Live Science, the science behind heartbreak is that stress hormones such as cortisol, adrenaline, and noradrenaline can cause negative emotions.
According to science, the reason why music brings back memories is that listening to it increases the likelihood that it will be encoded in memory along with details of a life event.
Fusion technology has recently piqued the interest of governments as well as private corporations such as Chevron and Google. Here’s the science of nuclear fusion explained.
In a recent interview, a UN official admitted that they partner with companies like Google to control the search results and she even claimed that “We Own The Science”.
A British Indian cardiologist has linked his father’s sudden death to the Pfizer vaccination and now calls vaccine misinformation “the greatest miscarriage of medical science.” Numerous important members of the worldwide medical community have endorsed Dr. Malhotra’s judgment.
Most academic scientists spend a lot of time writing grants that have very little chance of being funded. Because the funding environment is so competitive, many scientists feel pressure to emphasize the most positive, sensational results they can produce. Some academic scientists take this too far, by ignoring conflicting results
The astute reader will recognize that any asserted scientific “fact” or “conclusion” must be tempered with common sense, healthy skepticism, and a closer examination of those who stand to gain. This is the reality of the new peer-review and why ‘unbiased’ science is now often misleading.