The most frequent theme that pops when looking into WEF is “control.” They want to have control over our thoughts, where we go, what we say, what we eat, and how we dress. Here is the list of top 10 WEF dystopian agenda.
When the term “global elite” is used, it generally refers to a tiny number of wealthy and powerful people who act across national borders. These non-elected individuals meet in semi-secrecy through several organizations to decide on policies they want to see implemented on a worldwide scale.
The World Economic Forum (WEF) is right in the thick of things. Indeed, by having a council of world leaders attend and speak at its annual Davos meetings, the WEF aims to legitimize and normalize its impact on the globe’s democratic states.
The organization’s immense reach and influence may be shown just by looking at the list of participants (read below) at these meetings. The WEF brings together the top figures in media, politics, business, science, technology, and finance.
The Davos gatherings, according to the media, bring together people to debate issues including “inequality, climate change, and international cooperation.” This simple explanation looks to have been written specifically to make the common citizen yawn with boredom. However, the WEF’s topics go much beyond “inequality.”
People at the WEF have spoken some extremely unsettling things over the years, but none of them have received adequate media attention. When the themes championed by the WEF are put together, an underlying theme emerges: absolute control of humanity through the use of media, science, and technology, while altering democracies to build a worldwide government.
Continue reading if this appears like a far-fetched conspiracy idea. Here are the top ten most dystopian ideas now being promoted by the World Economic Forum. This sorted list is not in any specified sequence. Because they’re all equally crazy.
#10 Penetrating Governments
The least one can say is that Klaus Schwab, the WEF’s founder and chairman, is not a democracy supporter. In fact, he sees it as a barrier to achieving a completely globalized world.
Schwab claims that a globalized world is best controlled by a “self-selected coalition of multinational corporations, governments (including through the UN system), and select civil society organizations (CSOs)” in a 2010 WEF paper titled “Global Redesign.” This is the polar opposite of a democratic government.
He claimed that governments are no longer “the overwhelmingly dominant actors on the world stage” and that “the time has come for a new stakeholder paradigm of international governance.” As a result, the Transnational Institute (TNI) dubbed the WEF “a silent global coup d’état” to seize power.
In 2017, at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government, Schwab stated unequivocally what the media has long disregarded as a “conspiracy theory”: the World Economic Forum is “penetrating” governments around the world.
Schwab said:
“I have to say, when I mention now names, like Mrs. (Angela) Merkel and even Vladimir Putin, and so on, they all have been Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of now is the young generation, like Prime Minister [Justin] Trudeau, the President of Argentina and so on.
We penetrate the cabinets. So yesterday I was at a reception for Prime Minister Trudeau and I know that half of his cabinet, or even more than half of his cabinet, are actually Young Global Leaders of the World Economic Forum. (…) It’s true in Argentina and it’s true in France, with the President – a Young Global Leader.”
In this amazing address, Schwab declared unequivocally that the WEF “groomed” Angela Merkel of Germany, Vladimir Putin of Russia, Justin Trudeau of Canada, and Emmanuel Macron of France. He goes on to say that at least half of Canada’s cabinet is made up of people who are convinced on the WEF’s agenda. This is not some sort of hoax. This is the genuine truth, as confirmed by the World Economic Forum’s president.
#9 Controlling Minds Using Sound Waves
“Mind Control Using Sound Waves” was one of the topics discussed at the 2018 World Economic Forum. I did not change the title to make it more exciting; those are the actual terms used by the World Economic Forum.
The technology is described in the article as a potential treatment for Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease. The article does, however, say that “it can cure you, it can get you addicted, and it can kill you.” It can also be used to remotely control another person’s thoughts. According to the article:
“I can see the day coming where a scientist will be able to control what a person sees in their mind’s eye, by sending the right waves to the right place in their brain. My guess is that most objections will be similar to those we hear today about subliminal messages in advertisements, only much more vehement.
This technology is not without its risks of misuse. It could be a revolutionary healthcare technology for the sick, or a perfect controlling tool with which the ruthless control the weak. This time though, the control would be literal.”
Nobody can prevent scientists from creating this technology, according to the article’s conclusion. It should be regulated by groups like… the World Economic Forum to avoid misuse. Because some of the companies creating this technology are members of the WEF, this is beneficial. Do you see where I am heading with this?
#8 Pills That Contain Microchips
This title sounds like another far-fetched conspiracy theory that has been artfully phrased for excitement. It is not the case. Albert Bourla, the CEO of Pfizer, speaks about medicines with microchips in this video from the World Economic Forum’s 2018 summit.
Watch the video below:
Bourla says:
“FDA approved the first ‘electronic pill’, if I can call it like that. It is basically a biological chip that is in the tablet and, once you take the tablet, and it disolves into your stomach, it sends a signal that you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of that, the compliance. The insurance companies would know that the medicines that patients should take, they do take them. It is fascinating what happens in this field.”
Is this a truly fascinating field? Or is it completely dystopian? Imagine the compliance, as Bourla put it. This technology has the potential to be used for a variety of evil purposes. COVID has since placed Pfizer in a position of dominance that has never been seen before by a pharmaceutical corporation.
The World Economic Forum, like Pfizer, is leveraging COVID to advance its goal.
#7 Praising Massive Lockdowns
Cities all across the world were subjugated to huge and severe lockdowns in 2020 and 2021, resulting in job losses, deaths, drug overdoses, isolation, mental health concerns, domestic abuse, bankruptcies, and homelessness. Children were effectively prevented from socializing with other children and could not attend school for months during this dreadful period. While huge enterprises thrived, a plethora of small and medium businesses were decimated.
Despite this, the WEF could not conceal its fondness for life-threatening lockdowns. It even published a strange video titled “Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world.” This is a total piece of lunacy.
Watch the video below:
“Lockdowns significantly reduced human activity … leading to Earth’s quietest period in decades,” the movie says, while presenting dismal scenes of deserted towns and planes stalled in the air.
Despite the enormous human misery caused by these lockdowns, the World Economic Forum (WEF) decided that it was all worth it because “carbon emissions were down 7% in 2020.”
When this was first published, it drew a lot of criticism. As a result, the WEF removed the video above and replaced it with this tweet.
Despite removing the video, the WEF continued to praise lockdowns. The World Economic Forum wants “covidian” life to become everlasting.
#6 “Take a Peek at the Future”
According to comments on YouTube and social media, many despise the World Economic Forum’s videos. However, they continue to emerge. They do not give a damn what you think. They only want to sow the seed of madness in your head. The (WEF) encourages viewers to “take a peek at the future” in a film titled “How our Lives Could Soon Look.” It is also BLEAK. It is all about ensuring life under COVID’s survival.
Masked people, Purell dispensers, and QR codes prevail in the video. This is the vision they have for the future. Then there comes this tidbit of lunacy.
In the video, it is boldly stated:
“NASA has invented a system that can ID you from your heartbeat using a laser.”
As if that were not enough, the video depicts children who are stuck at home and are being educated via screens. The film concludes with individuals outside wearing masks, as if they are insane.
#5 Pushing For a Great Reset
As previously indicated, the World Economic Forum views the pandemic as a “opportunity.” It is not only a chance to remodel our personal lives, but also an opportunity to reorganize the entire world structure around its ideals. The World Economic Forum dubs it “the Great Reset.” The WEF developed a propaganda video (which fulfills the criteria of “propaganda”) to advocate this Reset (which no one wants). It is here in all of its craziness.
And below are some of the comments on this video before they turned it off:
This brief video manages to cram a lot of hidden ideas into it. It even mocks “conspiracy theories” while confirming them, which is astonishing.
The “death of capitalism” was also announced in the video.
While capitalism is based on a self-regulating system of supply and demand, the Great Reset aims to rethink how businesses are judged by introducing new criteria. The most important one is adhering to the elite’s social and political objectives.
The narrator says something mysterious near the end:
“And that’s all about getting the right people in the right place at the right time.”
While the film does not go into detail about what this sentence means in real life, the ramifications are frightening. Rather than enabling successful individuals and firms to develop naturally, the elite’s system would intervene to “get the right people at the right place at the right time” to forward its objective. In other words, in a new economy, the system would be skewed, and compliance with a broader agenda would be required.
The film concludes with an invitation for viewers to participate. Of course, you are not invited to the World Economic Forum. They are genuinely trying to “recalibrate” your right to free speech.
#4 “Recalibrating” freedom of speech
The constant ranting against free speech is an obvious method to spot world leaders who have been nurtured by the WEF. They despise it and are continually demanding for the internet to be heavily restricted and regulated. Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s “eSafety commissioner,” declared at the 2022 Davos meeting that we need a “recalibration of free speech.”
Grant said:
“We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere and everything feels binary when it doesn’t need to be. So I think we’re going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online. You know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to be free from online violence.”
Grant is essentially advocating for censorship in this passage. She even argues that “online violence” could be used as an occasion to “recalibrate” freedom of speech as a human right. “Online violence” is a concept that does not exist. They enjoy associating communication with violence. It is a deceptive technique of justifying censorship in the Chinese tradition.
In truth, free speech is binary. It is either there or it is not. And it is obvious that they do not want it to flourish.
#3 Tracking Your Clothes
The WEF wants to regulate your clothing. They have even created a video about it. Did I mention how much people despise WEF videos? Another one that made people’s blood boil was this one.
The WEF) announced the arrival of garments laced with “digital passports” that can be monitored at all times, using the environment as a justification (as usual). These garments, supported by Microsoft (of course), are expected to flood the market by 2025.
These chips, according to the World Economic Forum, will allow fashion firms to resell their products. I do not know how that would work. The video makes no mention of the fact that this technology could be used to follow people who have given up their smartphones.
However, abandoning your smartphone may become… impossible.
#2 “Smartphones will be in your body by 2030”
Nokia CEO Pekka Lundmark predicted that “smartphones will be implanted directly into the body” by 2030 during the Davos meeting in 2022. This would correspond to the introduction of 6G technology, which is projected by the end of the decade.
This site has chronicled the elite’s relentless push for transhumanism, or the blending of humans and robots, for years. They want to speed up the process by making products that people can not live without (like smartphones) available in a transhumanist version.
Are you aware of their weird need to insert objects into our bodies?
#1 “You’ll Own Nothing. And You’ll Be Happy.”
This is, without a doubt, the most nightmarish moment in the history of the World Economic Forum. Ida Auken, a Danish Member of Parliament, stated in 2016:
“Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better.”
The World Economic Forum was so taken by that phrase that it tweeted about it.
The World Economic Forum also produced a film titled “8 Predictions for the World in 2030,” which was widely panned. Here’s an example of a screenshot.
According to an article on the WEF’s website:
“I don’t own anything. I don’t own a car. I don’t own a house. I don’t own any appliances or any clothes,” writes Danish MP Ida Auken. Shopping is a distant memory in the city of 2030, whose inhabitants have cracked clean energy and borrow what they need on demand. It sounds utopian, until she mentions that her every move is tracked and outside the city live swathes of discontents, the ultimate vision of a society split in two.
There are no goods you can possess in this bleak future. Only “services” that are leased and delivered by drones are eligible. For every single basic requirement, this system would make all humanity fully reliant on WEF-controlled enterprises. There would be no autonomy, no independence, and no personal space. And you will be content.
Honorable Mention: Individual carbon footprint tracker
Alibaba Group president J. Michael Evans announced the construction of a “individual carbon tracker” during the Davos summit in 2022.
The WEF is using the environment to promote micro-management of human behavior once again. According to Evans, the tracker can track “where they’re traveling, how they’re traveling, what are they’re eating and what are they consuming on the platform.”
He used the pronoun “they” rather than “we” since there is no way in hell he is going to use that. Neither do I.
In Conclusion
When looking over this list, two similar patterns emerge. “Penetration” is the first theme. The World Economic Forum seeks to use “Global Leaders” to gain access to governments (aka Manchurian candidates). Pills, microchips, and immunizations are all ways it wants to get into our bodies. It also wants to use soundwaves, censorship, and propaganda to get into our heads.
“Control” is the other theme. They want to have control over our thoughts, where we go, what we say, what we eat, and how we dress.
Do you know who agrees with the World Economic Forum? China. People’s behaviour are controlled by a social credit system, and COVID is still used as a reason for enormous lockdowns and total population control. Not to mention the detention camps themselves. Despite this, Chinese officials are always present at World Economic Forum sessions. Why? Because China serves as a test bed for the World Economic Forum’s initiatives.
With all of this in mind, how can we combat the WEF’s lunacy? We can not vote them out if they were never elected in the first place. A first step would be to elect representatives who oppose the WEF at all levels of government. The WEF’s influence would be substantially decreased if our elected authorities recognized it as the rogue, illegitimate organization that it is.
Second, we can boycott any corporation that is a member of the World Economic Forum. Because many of these businesses are virtual monopolies, I understand that this is easier said than done. However, if we stop giving them our money, they will cease poisoning our lives with it.
They will be left with nothing. We will all be content.
Read the document below:
Support GreatGameIndia
The very real problem with the entire article is the failure to identify the real powers behind the WEF: Think very hard about this: Red Cross on a White Field, and, White Cross on a Red Field! Whom does that represent? In no particular order: City of London and Crown of England which includes the House of Lords; The Office of the Pope; The Swiss Guards of the Vatican; The Nation Switzerland; The International Red Cross; The Knights of Malta. Let me know if I left anyone out!
Yeah, red cross is english for the german name “roths child”
Sorry, that was meant to read, Red Shield, not cross. Booth borrowed the money to start the Red Cross from his friend lord Mayer Amschell Rothschild.
Sorry again, Booth started the Salvation Army with the money from Rothschild, Logo for the SA is a red shield, probably in homage or thanks to Mayer.
All that money and these idiots can’t buy a clue. They are making themselves and everyone else miserable with their incessant scrambling after more wealth. This is why they think they need to control us. They think now that we are on to them we will take their money, which we could…if we wanted to. Their are 7.9 billion people on this planet and 99.999% of us are too wise to focus every iota of our existence on ridiculous greed. They think they are smarter than we are and that is why they have more. The truth is we do not care to be like them. If I had all that money it would, quite frankly, be a bother. They need to read ‘Yertle the Turtle” about a creature that spent all of its time bossing others about and rose up on the backs of others. It did not end well.