Scientists Find Evidence Of Toxic Chemicals In Your Face Masks

Scientists have found toxic chemicals in preliminary analysis of face masks. These toxic substances found on face masks also involve carcinogens, allergens and controlled substances. Masks are used by general public these days mandated by governments in order to prevent Covid-19 infection. However, experts are concerned that toxic chemicals in face masks can cause unintended health issues.

Scientists Find Evidence Of Toxic Chemicals In Your Face Masks

Before pandemic, China was the leading mask manufacturer of the world and solidified this position amid the outbreak of pandemic. It makes 85% of all masks.

Over 70,000 new companies registered to manufacture and sell face masks in China in 2020. High demand of masks lead concerns that masks are being made recklessly.

Preliminary analysis revealed that these masks are laced with toxic chemicals which are restricted for both environmental and health reasons.

Scientists Find Evidence Of Toxic Chemicals In Your Face Masks
Pictured, a GCMS chromatogram of the chemicals and compounds found on a face mask. The data comes from the unique analytical technique developed by Dr Dieter Sedlak

These substances include formaldehyde that causes a burning sensation in eyes and nose, watery eyes, nausea, wheezing and coughing.

Director at the Hamburg Environmental Institute, Michael Braungart, conducted tests on masks that caused people to have rashes.

‘What we are breathing through our mouth and nose is actually hazardous waste,’ Professor Braungart said. 

These used masks were found to contain formaldehyde and other chemicals. 

Formaldehyde is the chemical which gives the ‘clean’ smell when a new pack of masks is opened. He also found aniline, a known carcinogen. 

‘We found formaldehyde and even aniline and noticed that unknown artificial fragrances were being applied to cover any unpleasant chemical smells from the mask,” he said. 

“In the case of the blue-coloured surgical masks, we found cobalt – which can be used as a blue dye.”

‘All in all, we have a chemical cocktail in front of our nose and mouth that has never been tested for either toxicity or any long-term effects on health,’ he said. 

Dr Dieter Sedlak, managing director and co-founder of Modern Testing Services in Augsburg, also found formaldehyde, hazardous fluorocarbons (toxic) and other chemicals with his own unique testing method.

‘Honestly, I had not expected PFCs would be found in a surgical mask, but we have special routine methods in our labs to detect these chemicals easily and can immediately identify them. This is a big issue,’ said Dr Sedlak.

It seems this had been deliberately applied as a fluid repellent – it would work to repel the virus in an aerosol droplet format – but PFC on your face, on your nose, on the mucus membranes or on the eyes is not good.’

PFCs are used in textiles to add a coating in items like jackets and rucksacks and this protective coating is not intended to be inhaled.

‘Based on my practical experience there is certainly an elevated unreasonable risk,’ says Dr Sedlak. 

Masks designed to be used by public are not categorized as PPE, so they are not subjected to meet the standards to design masks used by doctors.

Though, the accountability for ensuring masks meet the standards lies with the manufacturer and their local authorities.

But, these masks only have to meet general safety laws instead of having to meet medical grade standards and pass regular quality checks.

‘The General Product Safety Regulations 2005 (GPSR) sets out the responsibilities of the producers and distributors of these products,’ the UK government website states. 

‘As face coverings are not medical devices, we do not regulate these products.’ 

Dr Julian Tang, a clinical virologist at the University of Leicester, repeated the sentiment of Professor Braungart and Dr Sedlak that more strong research is required. 

‘Further studies on specific mask designs need to be performed if there is a perceived possible risk for any particular mask – and masks made by different manufacturers may not pose the same risks – if any exist,’ he said. 

He says if people are concerned about their masks, one option is to use professional surgical masks which do have to meet stricter standards. 

‘Southeast Asian countries have been using millions of surgical masks since the first SARS-COV-1 outbreaks in 2003 – with no reported ill effects,’ he adds.

‘But even before this, globally, surgical masks have been used in surgery by teams around the world – for decades – with no reported ill effects.’

Liz Cole, co-founder of the Us For Them organisation that advocates for children’s rights, says the findings are particularly concerning for youngsters. 

‘Us for Them are concerned that the recommendations for children to wear face coverings in classrooms seems to be informed by no new scientific evidence nor does any harm assessment appear to have been conducted,’ she said. 

‘Given the potential issues of child health and welfare at stake it is imperative that potential harms of face coverings in classrooms be considered and weighed against benefits’.

For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage.

Send in your tips and submissions by writing to us directly. Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates.

GreatGameIndia is being actively targeted by powerful forces who do not wish us to survive. Your contribution, however small help us keep afloat. We accept voluntary payment for the content available for free on this website via UPI, PayPal and Bitcoin.

Support GreatGameIndia


  1. ALL of it is by design. I have refused to ever wear a mask. Healthy people should NOT be wearing masks! This third and fourth wave of the virus was planned long ago by the puppet masters who own the central banks, including the Bank of China. These imposters are the puppet masters whose messiah is Lucifer/Satan. It is they who have created the free slave world in which we all live today. See my blog at to find out who they are…
    The Plandemic:
    “1st Phase: Common/cold/Flu. Mild symptoms at most. Media endorsement of mass paranoia and fear. Flawed testing system utilized, which picks up any genetic material in the body and triggers a positive result. Inflation of Covid case numbers, through changing of death certificates, double-counting, and classifying all deaths including other diseases and natural causes as Covid19. Lockdown will condition us to life under Draconian laws, prevent protests and identify public resistance.
    2nd Phase: The 1st Phase will lead to compromised and frail immune system through lack of food, social distancing, wearing of masks, and lack of contact with sunlight and healthy bacteria. Exposure to 5G radiation will further attack the immune system. Thus, when people re-emerge into society, more people will fall ill. This will be blamed on Covid19. This will all occur before the vaccination is ready to justify it. A longer and more potent lockdown will follow until everyone takes the vaccine.
    3rd Phase: If majority of people resist the vaccine, a weaponized SARS/HIV/MERS virus will be released. A lot of people will die from this. It will be survival of the fittest. It will also be the ultimate push for everyone to be vaccinated, in order to return to normality. Those who have taken the vaccine will be at war with those who have not. It will be anarchy from all sides.”

    “Covid-19means the ‘certificate of identification of vaccination with artificial intelligence’ and ’19’ was the year in which it was created.”

    “These alleged contagious viruses are, in fact, particles produced by the cells themselves as a consequence of certain stress factors such as drugs.” “These particles are then identified by antibody and PCR tests and interpreted as epidemic-causing viruses by doctors who have been inoculated for over 100 years by the theory [i.e. Germ Theory] that microbes are deadly and only modern medications and vaccines will protect us from virus pandemics.” Claus Kohnlein is a medical specialist of internal diseases. He completed his residency in the Oncology Department at the University of Kiel. Since 1993, he has worked in his own medical practice, treating Hepatitas C and AIDS patients who are skptical of antiviral medications.
    Torsten Engelbrecht is a freelance journalist in Hamburg. He has written articles for publications such as Medical Hypotheses, British Medical Journal (online), from 2000 to 2004, he worked as business editor of the Financial Times Deutschland. “We are not witnessing viral epidemics; we are witnessing epidemics of fear.”

    The Plannedemic Steps:
    1. FEAR!
    2. Information control & censorship
    3. Shutdown and social distancing
    4. Blame President Trump!
    5. Martial Law and Checkpoints
    6. Mandatory Vaccine Rollout

    Masks DO NOT WORK!

  2. Delores Cahill. As always, I’m not a doctor, take in all the information and decide for yourself. For an overall Survival Rate of 99.5% , that’s if you even catch it, I’d say the RISK isn’t worth taking. But hey I’m a numbers man, maybe you ain’t.
    Over 70s life expectancy after mRNA Vaccine 2 to 3 years, a 30 year old dead within 5 to 10 years.

  3. No Virus has ever been isolated, they just rebranded the Flu as an excuse to take away our freedoms and enslave us.

  4. There’s no way you actually believe all that. You are arguing against actual doctors who study these things. Link the websites you use as “evidence”

Leave a Reply