What the corporate press, Big Pharma, and the federal government are telling us is not true. Contrary to popular belief there is still no FDA approved COVID vaccine available in the United States today. And there are no plans to make one available in the near future. This begs the question, is Pfizer using children as legal human shields to get full authorization for its COVID vaccines?
Though it is hard to believe, it’s 100% true. And this reality hints at an incredible scandal within both Big Pharma and the U.S. Public Health bureaucracy.
On August 23, the FDA granted full approval for a COVID-19 vaccine to Pfizer-BioNtech for a specific product sold under the brand name Comirnaty. This product, Comirnaty, was fully authorized for the “prevention of COVID-19 disease in individuals 16 years of age and older.”
The landmark moment — the “full approval” endorsement from the FDA — was acclaimed by the Biden Administration and quickly leveraged to coerce millions into taking the shots.
But the fully approved version of Comirnaty itself has never made its way into the United States. Moreover, a separate product, considered under emergency use authorization (EUA), is the only “Pfizer shot” available in the United States.
As a reasonable explanation, early on, Pfizer and its government allies claimed that Comirnaty was not yet available because the EUA shots were still lining the shelves, and the FDA-approved version would soon be made available to all.
It has been over 4 months now, since full approval, but Comirnaty is still not being distributed.
The FDA has recognized Comirnaty as a “legally distinct” product with “certain differences,” but claims it does not impact safety or effectiveness of the shots. “Fact checkers” leverage the latter point of safety and efficacy to claim that people are still getting access to ingredients akin to the fully approved product.
The CDC continues to confirm that Comirnaty is “not orderable at this time.” Moreover, the CDC currently states that “Pfizer does not plan to produce any product with these NDCs (National Drug Codes) and labels over the next few months while EUA authorized product is still available and being made available for U.S. distribution.”
Now, back to the trillion dollar EUA question.
Is Pfizer refusing to make the fully authorized version available, because doing so could open up Pfizer and BioNTech to legal liability issues?
Talking to The Washington Post in a previous “fact check,” Pfizer and an HHS spokesperson claimed that there’s no additional legal immunity benefits between the EUA product and Comirnaty.
An EUA fully protects the drugmaker and grants zero legal recourse to the patient. This is one of the surefire protection measures that was bolstered by the PREP act to shield COVID companies from liability.
Now, here’s where it all gets very nefarious.
Due to a law passed during the Reagan Administration, the drug makers must first secure full approval for the children’s version of their shot in order to be granted more robust legal liability protection for their vaccines.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), which was passed into law in 1986, provides a legal liability shield to drug manufacturers if they receive full authorization for all ages.
Now is this the reason why Pfizer is seeking approval for children so that it can protect itself from lawsuits?
Surely, there’s also a monetary incentive at play, but maybe there’s another reason why Moderna, Pfizer and others are working relentlessly to authorize their products for children, who face near-zero risk from COVID-19, but continue to showcase alarming side effects from the vaccine.
Pfizer receives an extensive, additional layer of protection, if Comirnaty becomes available for all ages.
Support GreatGameIndia
I have just received my 3rd paycheck which said that $16285 that i have made just in one month by working online over my laptop. This job is amazing and its regular earnings xcv are much better than my regular office job. Join this job now and start making money online easily by just use this link…. Visit Here
” ” COMIRNITY” ” sorta rhymes w “co – morbidity”. Clever these marketers, n’est-ce pas ? …. …. shalom, al jenkins
The ethical and professional poverty of the drug industry, a juggernaut attacking human health for monetary profit at every turn, is becoming increasingly clear. The criminality of the whole operation is stupendous. The Rockefeller legacy in the medical profession must be overturned opening the way to a return to more natural remedies like Ivermectin. The cultivation of our natural immune systems is the way to go.
I think that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation are currently a greater threat to the medical profession than the Rockefeller’s. I agree with you, Anthony, that Ivermectin is a far safer and more effective remedy for Covid than the shots. However, Ivermectin isn’t a “natural remedy”, not that this makes any difference. It was co-developed by William Campbell of Merck & Co, Inc. In fact, but for Merck’s considerable investment into the drug, Ivermectin may never have helped millions of people. The following is copied from Wikipedia’s entry on the drug;
“The discovery of ivermectin has been described as a combination of “chance and choice.” Merck was looking for a broad-spectrum anthelmintic, which ivermectin is indeed; however, Campbell noted that they “…also found a broad-spectrum agent for the control of ectoparasitic insects and mites.”[85]
Merck began marketing ivermectin as a veterinary antiparasitic in 1981.[7] By 1986, ivermectin was registered for use in 46 countries and was administered massively to cattle, sheep and other animals.[86] By the late 1980s, ivermectin was the bestselling veterinary medicine in the world.[7] Following its blockbuster success as a veterinary antiparasitic, another Merck scientist, Mohamed Aziz, collaborated with the World Health Organization to test the safety and efficacy of ivermectin against onchocerciasis in humans.[13] They found it to be highly safe and effective,[87] triggering Merck to register ivermectin for human use as “Mectizan” in France in 1987.[13] A year later, Merck CEO Roy Vagelos agreed that Merck would donate all ivermectin needed to eradicate river blindness.[13] In 1998, that donation would be expanded to include ivermectin used to treat lymphatic filariasis.[13]”
I have just received my 3rd paycheck which said that $16285 that i have made just in one month by working online over my laptop. This job is amazing and its regular earnings xcv are much better than my regular office job. Join this job now and start making money online easily by just use this link….Visit Here
A lady on FB said there was a lawsuit filed by a team of 7 from UK . Hannah Rose and Co applicants to the International Criminal Court for Violations of the Nuremberg Codes Article 6 ,7,8
& 8/3 of Rome Statue
Dr Mike Yeadon is one of co-applicants . I have heard only good things from him responses to all the censorship at every turn. This is out of the UK but not limited to individuals in these countries the lawsuit said.
Crimes against Humanity
And experiments of gene manipulation is not a vaccine warp speed with no informed consent. Hope they win Big.
Story at dailyexpos a conservative site from UK that is censored like all are now by FB, Google and Twitter all behind the big experiment on humans.
Anthony Fauci and Bill and Melinda Gates and a long
list of people pushing the global agenda
using a virus from Wuhan China.
Hope you can track this. It’s needs to go Global. Mandates at the US Supreme Court now for hearings January 7, 2022
27 states and companies need to win for the world . Biden is pushing the global agenda and needs to stop now. You can’t reverse what they are doing to even the kids.
If you would like to know what big pharma is up to just imagine the most horrific scenario and there you have it. They revel in playing morality limbo where the bar is set ever lower and they slid under it with newer and more disgusting crimes against humanity. Experimenting on children is horrific so of course they scramble at the chance to do so. On the bright side, we outnumber them 7.9 billion decent, compassionate human beings to just a handful greedy monsters. The only way they can win is if we let them. Wake up! Stop buying their lies! Stand together and stand strong!
would the approved COVID vaccine not nullify the EUA for all the other “vaccines”
Nope. Most human beings are neither compassionate nor decent, Jennifer. They’re every bit as greedy as Pfizer’s veterinarian. They’re just stupid, like cows…. but just as greedy. The world will be a better place in 10 years.
I think you may be incorrect in that spelling. You might want to check again. Looked like Comi rna ty.
I have just received my 3rd paycheck which said that $16285 that i have made just in one month by working online over my laptop. This job is amazing and its regular earnings hax are much better than my regular office job. Join this job now and start making money online easily by just use this link…Visit Here
Hey not sure, sorry you have had that experience to make the observation that is so negative of humans. It is quite understandable as we are portrayed in this manner in media which in turn leads people to behave poorly. Being awful is pushed as the new normal. In places where people are not tuned in to those lies, you find that there are mostly nice and decent people. Think about it, how are nice people portrayed? There are portrayed as being idiots. At the same time the bad guys are portrayed as being super smart and also very beautiful. It is crazy that we are being so twisted. Evil people are idiots as they are making themselves miserable. Good people have the peace of mind that comes from knowing in their heart they are doing things in the best way they can. I am not saying we are 100% wonderful. I am just saying that I refuse to buy into the narrative that is being pushed. If they can make us hate each other it will be so much easier for them to attack us. If we love each other and stand together, they do not stand a chance.