We’ve witnessed irrational, illogical, hysterical, and absurd COVID lockdown lawmakers regularly drive a fear mongering campaign so that they can induce sheer panic into the population. However, there is no documented evidence of asymptomatic transmission of Covid-19, nor is there any recorded proof that can be said to be occurring in an appreciable way.
The spread of a pathogen certainly occurs when humans already have symptoms, especially when the symptoms releases pathogenic particles into the surrounding air. The absence of symptoms, or very mild symptoms, reduces the risk of spread, and if there are no symptoms, spread is virtually impossible. This also applies to SARS-CoV-2 or COVID-19.
A recent BMJ report concluded that asymptomatic people and transmission are barely what it was thought to be in terms of a driver. This is basic immunology. This shouldn’t come as a surprise for anyone, and it shouldn’t change for SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) either. However, the risk of asymptomatic spread has been used as the main reason for quarantines.
However, there was no proof. No data was provided to us. Fauci didn’t give us any proof either. There is no evidence proving the existence of asymptomatic spread. From the literature available, we can agree that ‘it is a dangerous assumption to believe that there is persuasive, scientific evidence of asymptomatic transmission’. There is nothing in terms of data yet.
The real catastrophe is the fact that, the idea of 40% to 50% of people infected with COVID could potentially cause the transmission of the disease despite being asymptomatic, was the core to impose societal lockdowns.
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
“But fears that the virus may be spread to a significant degree by asymptomatic carriers soon led government leaders to issue broad and lengthy stay-at-home orders and mask mandates out of concerns that anyone could be a silent spreader,” wrote Jeffery A. Tucker.
However, evidence that is capable of supporting common asymptomatic spread is still largely lacking and is overstated and potentially made with no basis. In fact, we have been deceived and the cheating has had devastating social consequences. Several people, including the likes of children, committed suicide due to lockdowns and school closings.
What does the proof say? Is there any evidence to support this contention? Well, a high quality review study by Madewell and published in JAMA attempted to estimate the rate of secondary SARS-CoV-2 attack in families and identify factors that alter this parameter.
Additionally, the researchers tried to estimate the proportion of families with index cases who experienced any kind of secondary transmission. They also made a direct comparison between the rate of SARS-CoV-2 secondary attacks in families with other severe viruses, but through close prompts for studies reporting secondary attack rates for both the close and household contacts.
This study was conducted in the form of a meta-analysis of 54 studies which included 77, 758 participants. The rate of secondary attack rates represented transmission to other additional people, and the researchers found that people with a positive symptom increased the risk in households by 25 times compared to asymptomatic infected index people.
“Household secondary attack rates were increased from symptomatic index cases (18.0%; 95% CI, 14.2%-22.1%) than from asymptomatic index cases (0.7%; 95% CI, 0%-4.9%),” they wrote. This study showed how rare the asymptomatic prevalence is in a limited home setting.
A survey of nearly two million school children in Sweden found there were no deaths from COVID without a mask mandate, and very few transmissions and minimal hospital stays.
In the UK, the ‘Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies’ recommended the following: “Prioritizing rapid testing of symptomatic people is likely to have a greater impact on identifying positive cases and reducing transmission than frequent testing of asymptomatic people in an outbreak area.”
A study published in Nature (which we thought would well convey the argument and put an end to the concept of asymptomatic spread) found no asymptomatic spread from ‘asymptomatic cases’ amongst the entirety of 1,174 people who came into close contact these cases, within a sample of 10 million people. Among all! “There were no positive tests amongst 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases,” it reported.
Jeffery A. Tucker from AIER responded as follows: “The conclusion is not that asymptomatic spread is rare or that the science is uncertain. The study revealed something that hardly ever happens in these kinds of studies. There was not one documented case. Forget rare. Forget even Fauci’s previous suggestion that asymptomatic transmission exists but does not drive the spread. Replace all that with: never. At least not in this study for 10,000,000.”
Goa et al. conducted a study on the infection capability of asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2. The researchers looked at 455 people who had been exposed to an asymptomatic carrier of the Covid-19 virus. They were split into three groups which included the likes of 35 patients, 196 family members, and 224 hospital staff. “No severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections was detected in 455 contacts by nucleic acid test,” they reported.
In the meantime, the World Health Organization (WHO) has declared that asymptomatic transmission / transmission of COVID-19 is extremely rare. While a detailed and complete explanation by the WHO is rare, it is still not capable of putting the erroneous concept to bed.
The problem of asymptomatic spread is one of the main issues brought up as a reason to force vaccinate children. However, science still opposes this proposed political policy mandate.
As an update, released about 18 months later on June 29, 2021, the World Health Organization recommended not to test asymptomatic people. It happened after trillions of dollars were stripped from the economy and many people lost their lives due to job losses and the closure of communities and schools. Many people have committed suicide because of the unscientific and irrational policies of testing asymptomatic people.
The conclusion is that we have been misled to create fear so that residents can easily comply with the lockdowns. Misunderstandings about asymptomatic prevalence, recurrent infections, and risk equality, regardless of fundamentally classified risks based on age risk, were used to guide compliant masking and lockdowns.
All of these concepts were promoted without evidence, and they all worked together to destroy societies. The information released about the asymptomatic spread which was propagated by the COVID Task Forces and its insane lockdown maniac advisors was inaccurate and was not based on any evidence or scientific knowledge. All they did was wreak havoc on communities, the economy and the lives of citizens. Many could not stand it and committed suicide.
In conclusion, we would like to say that Fauci misled the entire world with misleading, unscientific, and absurd statements. In saying this or that on varying days, he presented utter contradictions that terribly confused the whole world.