Lockdowns Were Invalid Due To Illegal Implementation Rules Canadian Court

On Tuesday, an Alberta court declared (read below) that the Covid-related lockdown orders were invalid.

As a result of the ruling in Ingram v. Alberta, prosecutors may have to drop charges against individuals, churches, and other organizations in various ongoing cases.

Justice Barbara Romaine sided with the applicants, citing that the Chief Medical Officer of Health (CMOH) had overstepped her authority by delegating decisions to the cabinet, which was not permissible under Canadian law. During the trial, the CMOH herself testified that she only offered advice and recommendations to politicians, without making the decisions herself.

Justice Romaine did acknowledge that the lockdowns breached the rights in section 2 of the Canadian Charter, but clarified that they would not have violated the Charter had they been implemented lawfully.

“If I am incorrect with respect to whether [the orders were legal], these infringements were amply justified as reasonable limits in a fre...

Limited Time

Full Access

$10
Monthly

Included:

  • Access to All Articles.
  • One Plan. No Tiers.
  • No Ads.
  • Cancel anytime.
register now

 
Do you have a tip or sensitive material to share with GGI? Are you a journalist, researcher or independent blogger and want to write for us? You can reach us at [email protected].