Hammer Assault On Paul Pelosi Explained

Despite Democrats and the media’s hasty designation of the assault on Paul Pelosi as an instance of political violence, authorities have not yet stated a motive. Here’s the hammer assault on Paul Pelosi explained.

Hammer Assault On Paul Pelosi Explained

As speculations circulate on social media, additional information about the hammer assault on Paul Pelosi, husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, has surfaced, including the startling revelation that Pelosi referred to his assailant as a “friend” when phoning police.

Paul Joseph Watson describes everything in five words: “it seems a bit odd…”

An updated version of the incident, as published by the Los Angeles Times and other media sites quoting police sources, is provided below, along with some insight on rumors that have been circulating about it.

Watch the video below:

[jetpack_subscription_form title="Subscribe to GreatGameIndia" subscribe_text="Enter your email address to subscribe to GGI and receive notifications of new posts by email."]

DePape reportedly entered the residence and confronted Pelosi after bursting through a back door in the early hours of Friday morning.

Hammer Assault On Paul Pelosi Explained 2
Screen grab from aerial video shows damage to a back door of the Pelosi home (KGO TV via Reuters)

Pelosi gave DePape his excuse that he had to go to the restroom. There, at around 2:30 in the morning, he secretly dialed 911. According to sources cited by Politico, the phone had been charging there.

The San Francisco Police dispatcher reported what Pelosi stated when directing the police response, making reference to him as “RP,” which is police lingo for “reporting party”:

“RP stated that there’s a male in the home and that he’s going to wait for his wife. RP stated that he doesn’t know who the male is, but he advised that his name is David and that he is a friend. RP sounded somewhat confused.”

Police officers arrived at the Pelosi residence in little under 2 minutes, which is a response time that is far from common in modern American cities. Someone, whose identity is unknown, answered the door when they knocked.

The two males were seen by the police, each with one hand holding a single hammer, and they were each told to drop it. Pelosi was struck with it by DePape as soon as he took it away. DePape was tackled by the police, who then arrested him.

The LA Times’ portrayal of Pelosi’s 911 call contains some inconsistencies. According to the Times, Pelosi “tricked” DePape and initiated a secret phone call, but in the same item says “officials believe Pelosi was intentionally giving coded information because the intruder knew Pelosi was on the phone.”

Perhaps the call began covertly, but DePape overheard him, or Pelosi was suspicious of it. Keeping that in mind, it is possible Pelosi was not being genuine when he called DePape a “friend,” but was instead attempting to calm the supposedly insane DePape, who had been characterized as a “psychotic, homeless addict estranged from his nudist lover and their children” – and who “talks to angels.”

Hammer Assault On Paul Pelosi Explained 3
David DePape (San Francisco Chronicle)

This may also help to explain why the dispatcher reported Pelosi as sounding “somewhat confused.” if he was being monitored or was afraid of it. Chief Bill Scott of the San Francisco Police Department stated at a press conference on Friday that Pelosi’s request for assistance required dispatcher Heather Grimes to read between the lines:

“She had to interpret what she was being told. And based on her experience and intuition, she basically figured out that there was something more to this incident than what she was being told. Her actions, in my opinion, resulted in both a higher-priority dispatch and a faster police response.”

DePape is now infamous for yelling “Where is Nancy? Where is Nancy?” It is unclear when.

Based on a statement from Nancy Pelosi’s office, Pelosi needed surgery to “repair a skull fracture, and serious injuries to his right arm and hands.”

There are claims on social media that DePape was in his underwear when police came, as well as others that he and Pelosi were both in their underwear.

According to “sources,” San Francisco Fox affiliate KTVU reported on Friday that DePape was in his underwear. KTVU, on the other hand, has reversed that assertion and put a correction at the bottom of the article: “An earlier version of this story misstated what clothing the suspect was wearing when officers found him.”

However, there is a lot of underwear chatter on Twitter and other platforms, as well as some misinterpreting an early SFPD statement to imply that both Pelosi and DePape were holding hammers. Dinesh D’Souza, swept up in the frenzy, is one of those who lost reputation points over the weekend, despite amassing tens of thousands of likes:

Last but not least, despite Democrats and the media’s hasty designation of the assault as an instance of political violence, authorities have not stated a motive.

After clearing everything up, it should be noted that none of it prevented Hillary Clinton from joining the bandwagon and asserting that the source must have been a MAGA or QAnon conspiracy theorist, to which Elon Musk immediately responded…

“There is a tiny possibility there might be more to this story than meets the eye.”

Hammer Assault On Paul Pelosi Explained 4

Which he has subsequently removed.

However, Glenn Greenwald brings up the major talking point in the media.

Maybe Musk should have tweeted Michael Shellenberger’s viewpoint instead.

Neighbors described DePape as a homeless addict with a politics that was, until recently, left-wing, but of secondary importance to his psychotic and paranoid behavior.

“What I know about the family is that they’re very radical activists,” said one of DePape’s neighbors, a woman who only gave her first name, Trish.

“They seem very left. They are all about the Black Lives Matter movement. Gay pride. But they’re very detached from reality. They have called the cops on several of the neighbors, including us, claiming that we are plotting against them. It’s really weird to see that they are willing to be so aggressive toward somebody else who is also a lefty.”

Regardless of fact or conspiracy, the ability to have a “conversation” without it resulting in a #InstaBan seems like a significant step towards the reinstatement of free speech… and the ability for Americans to choose their own opinions rather than being forced into one narrative uber alles.

GreatGameIndia is being actively targeted by powerful forces who do not wish us to survive. Your contribution, however small help us keep afloat. We accept voluntary payment for the content available for free on this website via UPI, PayPal and Bitcoin.

Support GreatGameIndia

Leave a Reply