Fully Vaccinated More Likely To Die From COVID Than Unvaccinated Shows Shocking Scottish Report

Shocking statistics from the Public Health Scotland report show that the fully vaccinated are more likely to die from COVID than the unvaccinated.

Fully Vaccinated More Likely To Die From COVID Than Unvaccinated Shows Shocking Scottish Report

According to fresh statistics from Scotland’s health authority, infection and hospitalization with COVID-19 are more frequent in people who have had at least one COVID-19 vaccination than in people who haven’t had any, and mortality from a double dosage is considerably more probable than in people who haven’t had any doses.

From December 11 to January 7, as per the newest COVID study from Public Health Scotland (PHS), case numbers for individuals testing positive for the virus seem to have been persistently lower amongst the unvaccinated, with the exception of the first week, when the triple-jabbed flagged up a marginally reduced rate of infection than the un-jabbed.

In three of the four weeks, the double vaccinated had twice the infection frequency of the un-jabbed and just mildly below double the rate in the fourth week.

Across the identical time frame, the single- and triple-jabbed had lower rates of infection than the double-jabbed, but still had approximately 1.3 and 1.4 times the amount of infections as the un-jabbed.

Subscribe to GreatGameIndia

Enter your email address to subscribe to GGI and receive notifications of new posts by email.

fully vaccinated die covid 1
Table 11: PHS Report

In terms of virus-related hospitalization, the double-jabbed were much more prone to be hospitalized than all of the other groups, even for those who have not yet been given a shot, having over twice as many admissions reported during the final week of the study as the un-jabbed. Those who had a booster shot were the least likely to be admitted to the hospital, with the single-jabbed having more hospitalizations in just one week than that of the un-jabbed.

fully vaccinated die covid 2
Table 12: PHS Report

During the four-week period from December 4 to December 31, the double vaccinated had considerably higher COVID-19 fatalities per 100,000 people than that of the un-jabbed. Across the corresponding time span, the double-jabbed incurred 137 deaths, whilst the un-jabbed succumbed to the virus 46 times. In percentage, that equates to 4.8 deaths per 100,000 among the un-jabbed and 7.67 deaths per 100,000 among the double-jabbed throughout the four weeks.

In half of the four weeks, individuals who had only one dosage of immunization dropped dead at an elevated rate equivalent than that of the un-jabbed, whereas those who had a booster had the lowest mortality rate with COVID-19 of the four classifications.

fully vaccinated die covid 3
Table 13: PHS Report

PHS has blamed adults above 70 who still haven’t had a booster dose for the sharp spike in infections, hospitalizations, and deaths amongst COVID-positive patients who have acquired two shots of the injections.

“This group of individuals aged 70-plus who have had two doses of vaccine but have not yet had a booster may include some very vulnerable individuals,” the report stated.

According to a PHS spokesperson, the “vaccination status of cases, inpatients, and deaths should not be used to assess vaccine effectiveness because of differences in risk, behaviour, and testing in the vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.”

The pattern in Scotland for the double-jabbed populace, on the other hand, supports a study presented on December 20 by Danish researchers, which found that patients who receive two doses of an mRNA COVID shot had a higher risk of contracting omicron than those who do not.

England and Wales, Scotland’s national neighbors, have likewise recorded increased COVID incidences and unprecedented infections among vaccinated adults over the age of 18. The immunized have also began to overwhelm COVID hospitalizations and deaths throughout the rest of the UK, according to the latest weekly COVID report from the UK Health Security Agency.

Other heavily immunized European countries, as well as sections of the United States, have reported similar findings.

Furthermore, an Israeli researcher, Professor Gili Regev-Yochay, has stated that provisional outcomes of a research into the potency of a second booster, or fourth dose, demonstrate that the prevailing batch of COVID vaccines are “not good enough,” because they have proven to be “less effective against the omicron strain.”

GreatGameIndia is being actively targeted by powerful forces who do not wish us to survive. Your contribution, however small help us keep afloat. We accept voluntary payment for the content available for free on this website via UPI, PayPal and Bitcoin.

Support GreatGameIndia

8 COMMENTS

  1. Seems to me from many reports I’ve read that Omicrom (Moronic) is designed to target the fully vaccinated. Official stats show hardly any unvaccinated people are getting sick with Omicron.
    There may be a logical explanation. Early in the pandemic there were reportsd that several independent researchers had seen evidence that SARS2cov virus had been genetically modified with genes from the HIV virus. Now with the immune system being overwhelmed by spike proteins from the mRNA vaccines, vaccinated people have poor or no immunity.
    I’m not saying that is true, but it makes sense.

  2. Whatever the last vaccine or booster you have , those are the antibodies you have. Looks like the 2nd dose antibodies aren’t very effective against Omicron. Or unvaccinated people are just less likely to go to the hospital because they haven’t bought into as much of the media fear.

  3. That is correct. It contains HIV traits, the original SARs strain from early 2000, and a third combinant, that appears to have high similarity to MERS. This is SARS-CoV-2

    This is a bioweapon.

    However, the mRNA “vaccines” are also a synthetic bioweapon.

    The mRNA technology is using the spike protein. This is the HIV trait. So, they are infecting people with a synthetic HIV, the delivery system, mRNA, allows it to penetrate the cell and deliver RNA alteration. The HIV retrovirus is an RNA viral infection that reverts (thus retrovirus) to DNA.

    In laymans terms, what does that mean?

    It means that the synthetic HIV combines with a persons cells with perhaps as high as 50% likelihood to permanently alter a persons DNA, reducing much of their immunity from virual, bacterial, carcinogenic, and toxic harm for life.

    A new, “planned obcelesence” human.

    A race of cash cows for the pharmaceutical industry.

  4. Yeah, but the deaths of the ones who are jabbed are much less severe than the deaths of the un-jabbed. AND the jabbed are not enemies of Gene Simmons and his Kiss Army meaning they have no worries about scary makeup faces showing up at their doors.

  5. It really is true, the fauxinnes are intended to control world population by causing the destruction of the human immune system. In typical selfish mogul fashion, the ones instigating the culling of what they consider undesirable among us deem themselves to be above any such culling. If they truly wish to lower the population perhaps they could set a fine example by leaving? In my humble opinion the world would be so much better off without them. There are 7.9 billion of us and only a handful of greedy moguls … the only way they can win is if we let them.

  6. THEIR cocaine, pedophilia, and torturing children end them by nightfall if all people help end their reign.

Leave a Reply