Now that the narrative is beginning to shift, those who supported it are grasping for reasons to explain their incorrect decisions to support lockdowns, uphold the denial of early treatment for COVID-19, and advocate for perpetual vaccine mandates. For example:
- The first widespread plea for amnesty for past vaccines misconducts, argued that “we didn’t know”, and cited the lack of data to justify the nonsensical approach that was taken to handling the pandemic.
- The second such plea from Scott Adams essentially said that those who chose to oppose the narrative had won a coin flip and got lucky with the choice they followed.
- The most recent plea was a bit more honest, but still shared many of the issues seen in the previous ones, and refused to acknowledge the key mistakes that were made.
I, in turn, have identified two characteristics that kept some people from being pulled into the narrative early on, and in many cases, one without the other was not sufficient to prevent a person from vaccinating (e.g., I know quite a few people who had serious objections to the childhood vaccine program, but nonetheless chose to receive a COVID vaccine).
First, the majority of people utilize the “social proof” heuristic, whereby they typically make decisions based on the experiences of their peers. The social proof heuristic (commonly associated with the Asch experiments) helps to explain why a nonsensical message being widely disseminated throughout the media, rapidly results in many members of the public then adopting it, and why the medical profession can often become incapable of seeing evidence that challenges a prevailing orthodoxy.
Conversely, there is always a minority of the population who do not require social proof to make decisions, and they will typically be the first to adopt a new trend (such as buying a stock before everyone else catches on and its value skyrockets). I have found that virtually every individual I’ve gotten to know who bucked the COVID-19 narrative has shared this personality trait.
Second, the same types of crimes tend to be perpetrated repeatedly on the public, so those who become wise to them are less likely to fall for them in the future. In the case of COVID-19, almost every single misdeed that we saw transpire had played out in the past (e.g., RFK has done a remarkable job bringing attention to what Anthony Fauci did in the early days of HIV, and how he used an almost identical script for COVID-19). Because of this, if you can learn what transpired before, you can prevent it from happening again, and putting a spotlight on these longstanding issues is a key focus of The Forgotten Side of Medicine.
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
In addition to the early days of AIDS, one of the most important precedents for the COVID-19 response was the largely forgotten anthrax vaccine debacle.
Gulf War Syndrome (GWS)
The Gulf War was a rapid and overwhelming victory for the United States that had very few battlefield casualties for our armed forces. However, soon after the war, almost 36% of soldiers (approximately 250,000 of the 697,000 who served) came down with a debilitating illness that eventually came to be known as “Gulf War Syndrome (GWS).” Initially, the military gaslighted the veterans by insisting that the illness was due to stress (which for many reasons was nonsensical), and then introduced a variety of contradictory studies to explain what else could be causing GWS.
Although a case can be made for many of the potential causes of GWS, by far the strongest case exists for the experimental anthrax vaccination campaign that was conducted during the Gulf War. This is because GWS was almost nonexistent in the other nations who participated in the Gulf War but did not vaccinate their troops, and an illness identical to GWS was observed in troops who were vaccinated but never left the United States (including those who were vaccinated a decade after the Gulf War).
In addition to the COVID-19 vaccines, a few other vaccines that were administered to the general population were dangerous enough to provoke widespread resistance to their use. The original smallpox vaccine (which frequently failed to work) had a catastrophic rate of injuries and inspired one of the largest protest movements of the era a century ago to end the vaccine mandates (which ultimately played a critical role in ending smallpox). In recent times, smallpox vaccination has been reserved for the military, where its use was halted due to the significant adverse events it created.
First approved in 2006, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (which, like the COVID-19 vaccine, was approved based on fraudulent clinical trials that concealed many adverse events by gaslighting the trial participants) caused a large number of injuries once it entered the market. This, in turn, required the government to utilize a similar playbook with the COVID-19 vaccines so that they could continue being sold.
I believe that a primary mechanism for vaccine injury is their ability to impair circulation (e.g., by causing blood cells to stick together), something most frequently observed in the most dangerous vaccines (e.g., the spike protein made by the COVID-19 vaccines causes this to happen). Once you know how to identify these injuries, you can frequently observe subtle neurological deficits arising from microstrokes in vaccinated individuals. One of the most striking effects attributed to the anthrax vaccine (I do not know of any other vaccine where this was observed) was that children of vaccinated mothers were born without limbs, a birth defect known to arise from significant circulatory impairment to the fetus (and it is now advised to avoid the anthrax vaccine in the first trimester of pregnancy).
Despite those strong contenders for the most dangerous vaccine, as this article will show, a good case can be made that the anthrax vaccines were the most dangerous vaccine ever administered to a large number of people. The scheme used by the military to conceal their adverse events and gaslight the injured is thus quite useful for understanding how the COVID-19 vaccines were orchestrated.
The Anthrax Vaccines
A division of the military was heavily invested in developing countermeasures for biological weapons, and since anthrax is one of the most dangerous bioweapons in existence, they had worked for decades to create a vaccine against it. Unfortunately, the best vaccine they had been able to develop for anthrax had a variety of shortcomings, such as it was difficult to produce in large batches (with the manufacturer frequently running into quality control issues for their product), requiring 4-6 doses of the vaccine, it was not as effective towards weaponized strains (which is what you actually want to vaccinate against) and taking months for it to create immunity in the recipients.
At the time of the Gulf War, the military was concerned that Saddam Hussein would deploy anthrax against our soldiers. As a result, a vaccination solution was needed, even though no ideal option existed. Immediately before the war began, a suspicious anthrax vaccination campaign was initiated, which many members of the military firmly believe was a mass experiment on soldiers.
For example, countless servicemen who received the vaccine recall a time when they were suddenly being rounded up and sent to a vaccine site for an unspecified vaccine, being told that the vaccine they were going to receive would not be annotated in their medical record, and then having the only record of it be “Vaccine A” on their service card (a “Vaccine B,” thought to be one for the botulin toxin, was also sometimes given in this manner). Similarly, as resistance to the anthrax vaccine grew (following more and more stories of severe injuries or death from it), the military became more and more aggressive about mandating it on everyone, frequently placing servicemen in a position where they could either vaccinate or be court-marshaled.
This documentary gives an idea of the human cost of this program (as you watch it, you will notice an eerie number of parallels to what we are seeing now):
Watch the video below:
The anthrax vaccine campaign continued long after the Gulf War ended, and eventually, the body count from it resulted in a 1998 law being passed that for the most part prohibited members of the military from being forced to take experimental (non-FDA approved) medications. Later in 2004, after a court overturned the anthrax mandate, a law was enacted to allow certain emergency-use authorizations. Sadly, as vaccine-injured friends in the military have shared with me (who for months first tried to lawfully avoid the illegal COVID-19 vaccine mandate), the military chose to disregard the legal process they were required to follow this time around.
The anthrax catastrophe also prompted congressional investigations of the DoD that exposed the same system that I believe was implemented to force the COVID-19 vaccines on the American population. During these proceedings in Congress, the DoD was uncharacteristically evasive in reporting their actions.
Note: Meryl Nass M.D., has actively advocated for the vaccine-injured servicemen and directly participated in legislative proceedings regarding the vaccines. I have learned a great deal about the vaccines through direct correspondence with her.
At this point, there are a few hypotheses to explain why the anthrax vaccine was so harmful. The most probable one (which Nass believes) is that many shortcuts were taken to be able to vaccinate the military in time for their deployment during the Gulf War. This was particularly problematic because the anthrax vaccine was an inherently dirty vaccine since its manufacturing process (which involved culturing, killing, and then purifying large numbers of anthrax bacteria) produced a substance that was highly likely to produce adverse reactions in the recipients, and was challenging to filter.
Due to the vaccine being produced in a rushed manner for the military, steps that could have made the vaccine cleaner were skipped. For example, when the manufacturer, Bioport, was investigated by the Government Accountability Organization (the GAO serves as Congress’s watchdog), it was discovered that Bioport exchanged the filters on the final vaccine product to larger ones that did not become clogged (but likewise were no longer as effective for purifying the vaccine), and failed to notify the FDA of this critical change. Similarly, the FDA also had concerns about other aspects of Bioport’s quality control, repeatedly cited Bioport for their manufacturing processes, and suspended shipments of the vaccine from their facility.
Bioport ultimately had to change its name (presumably due to the bad press it garnered from the anthrax vaccine), and the defense contractor was renamed Emergent Biosolutions. Recently, it was tasked with manufacturing Johnson & Johnson’s COVID-19 vaccine, and after quality control issues emerged, Emergent Biosolutions was required by the FDA to dispose of millions of improperly produced doses. It should be noted that FDA inspectors have come forward and disclosed that there are serious deficiencies in America’s vaccine manufacturing facilities (which the FDA has done very little to address), and that these quality control issues became much worse during Operation Warp Speed (the accelerated process to mass product COVID-19 vaccines).
Note: There are also two alternative hypotheses to explain the toxicity of the anthrax vaccines which both have compelling but inconclusive evidence supporting them. The first was that the vaccine deployed upon the military contained a (then experimental) squalene adjuvant which caused significant side effects (this hypothesis is discussed within the book Vaccine A). The second was that many of the symptoms experienced by the vaccine recipients came from a weaponized mycoplasma (this hypothesis has been extensively discussed by Garth Nicholson).
Although there are many fears about flying on airlines, in reality, they are by far the safest mode of transportation. This safety record has been a result of the aviation industry and governments around the world assembling a robust system (e.g., a co-pilot for every airplane) to eliminate the risk of any potential accident. Similarly, whenever an accident nonetheless occurs, it is extensively investigated so that the error can be identified and prevented from happening again.
Since the COVID-19 vaccines have come out, numerous disturbing incidents have been reported of pilots who lost the ability to fly following vaccination. In my own circle, a close friend and physician had a patient whose spouse was a pilot for a major commercial airline. Following vaccination, this pilot developed permanent blurred vision and headaches, and has since been grounded ever since. Likewise, on a short flight last year (approximately 90 minutes in duration), once we landed, paramedics had to remove a passenger from the plane for heart issues (whom, based on the conversations I heard, I inferred that the patient had likely been both boosted and vaccinated).
Since the vaccines were rolled out, numerous high-profile events have similarly occurred which have raised suspicions that the vaccine is threatening air safety (e.g., this one). However, in each case where a highly unusual crash occurred, the information necessary for me to determine if vaccination was responsible for their death has not been available.
Conversely, there have been numerous near-misses where the vaccine appeared to be the causative agent. These include:
- Patrick Ford had a fatal heart attack shortly after lifting off from Chicago O’Hare. His co-pilot managed to take control and land the plane. This is the most dangerous time a pilot can become incapacitated and it is extremely fortunate that the experienced co-pilot was able to save the lives of those on that flight.
- Bob Snow suffered a sudden cardiac arrest immediately after landing at the Dallas-Fort Worth airport.
- Wilburn Wolfe, 11 days after receiving the J&J vaccine, developed a migraine-like headache. Two days later, while not on duty, he had a seizure. After the seizure ended, he was paralyzed on the right side of his body. At the hospital, it was discovered that he had had a hemorrhagic stroke (a brain bleed). He was put in a medically induced coma and ultimately died 17 days after his initial vaccination.
- Cody Flint, an agricultural pilot, had a reaction immediately following vaccination that progressively worsened, and two days later, while flying , became severely disoriented but miraculously, was able to land safely.
Given the degree to which the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) normally prioritizes eliminating any potential risk to airline safety, it is quite strange that they have not investigated any of these cases, and instead have declared that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective. Fortunately, Steve Kirsch was recently able to bring public attention to this issue.
Kirsch discovered that in October 2022, the FAA quietly changed the acceptable electrocardiogram (EKG) threshold to be medically cleared to fly by extending the allowable PR interval past the 200 millisecond threshold (something known to correlate with an increased risk of heart conditions—discussed further in this interview). This change implies that the FAA noticed a large number of pilots were developing abnormal EKG findings, and this change was required to maintain our supply of commercial pilots. Although the FAA has denied this theory, they have simultaneously failed to provide an explanation for why this change was made.
Many pilots in the airline industry have also directly reached out to Kirsch to share how they have observed debilitating COVID vaccination side effects take away pilots’ ability to fly. Additionally, they have also noted that there has been a dramatic increase in the death rate of commercial pilots since vaccines were mandated throughout the industry.
The military places a high value on its pilots (they cost a lot to train, and the aircrafts they fly are even more expensive). Unfortunately, both previously with the anthrax vaccines, and presently with the COVID-19 vaccines, their value does not seem to outweigh the forces within the DoD that are committed to continuing their biological countermeasures programs.
Following the Gulf War, one of the primary sites where the dangerous anthrax vaccines were deployed was Dover Air Force Base (located in Biden’s home state of Delaware, with the disaster there unfolding at the time he was their senator). Because many injuries occurred, not surprisingly, many military pilots were also injured and permanently lost their ability to fly. This is a brief compilation of some of them:
When I wrote this article, I also reached out to a rheumatologist colleague who had previously worked with many at the Veteran’s Administration who had been injured by the anthrax vaccine and asked him if he had ever seen any military pilots who lost the ability to fly. He told me:
Because of the injuries that the pilots experienced, the GAO launched an investigation into the effects of the anthrax vaccine on our aircrew and pilots. Their report found that:
- Between September 1998 and September 2000, 16% of the pilots and aircrew chose to transfer to a non-flying position or they retired to avoid the vaccine, while 20% of those who remained indicated their intention to leave in the near future.
- Two-thirds of those in the Reserves or National Guard did not support the vaccination program for anthrax or any future biological weapons.
- Most of the reactions experienced from the vaccines were not reported due to fear of retaliation for doing so.
- It was estimated that 37% of those surveyed had received at least one anthrax vaccine, and 85% of this group experienced an adverse reaction (this was more than double the rate claimed by the manufacturer).
- 0.6% of anthrax vaccine recipients experienced blackouts (Cody Flint—mentioned above—experienced a harrowing blackout while flying).
Anthrax Vaccine Injured Pilots
Both Vaccine A and The Vaccine Epidemic contain many heart-wrenching, tragic stories of what happened to pilots who were injured by the anthrax vaccine. In this section, I will quote some of them. When you consider the critical importance of pilots to the military, it is astounding that the issue was ignored and the injured were instead severely gaslighted by the military.
Note: I recently learned of a case where a friend discovered an unconscious woman had crashed into his property after having a sudden “unexplained” stroke while driving. He was fortunately able to get to her to the hospital in time to save her life.
At Dover Airforce Base, a survey completed by members of one unit found that 32% experienced serious side effects such as severe joint pain, memory loss, and arthritis following anthrax vaccination. The wave of injuries following anthrax vaccination caused the commander of Dover Air Force Base, Colonel Felix Grieder, to become concerned enough to contact the Pentagon about them.
After the Pentagon stonewalled him and refused to address any of his concerns, Grieder suspended the program (a move that cost him his career). Six days later, numerous high-ranking officers from the Pentagon showed up to host a town hall on the vaccines (which shocked many at the base as it is exceedingly rare for a response like this by the military’s chain of command). They repeatedly assured the servicemen that the vaccines were safe, and trusting his superiors, Grieder reinstated the mandate.
Although so much more could be written on this debacle, one thing particularly stood out to me when I reviewed testimonies of servicemen from Dover Airforce Base: if the issues with the anthrax vaccine on soldiers were not addressed, the civilian population would be next.
The Current Era
If we want to prevent atrocities like the one we are witnessing unfolding in front of us right now, we have to learn where they came from. Each of these events is typically first conducted on a smaller and more vulnerable group of people that cannot advocate for themselves. Soldiers in the military represent one such group as they are viewed as an ideal cohort to conduct experiments on because they are all relatively healthy, and must to participate in the experiments since soldiers are required to follow orders (thereby ensuring compliance and silence). Previously other vulnerable groups were also frequently utilized (e.g., slaves, prisoners, and mentally handicapped patients) but activists of previous eras were able to outlaw this inhumane experimentation, so those nonetheless seeking to do it have increasingly needed to rely upon the military for test subjects.
I cannot prove this, but from looking at everything I’ve pieced together, I believe the collective psychology within the military that allows things like the Anthrax campaign to happen is something like the following:
- Most government officials do not have a good understanding of scientific topics.
- Because of this, officials will typically defer to the advice of scientific experts, especially regarding things that are very psychologically frightening (e.g., a “bioweapon”) or doing something that is in accordance with our longstanding cultural beliefs (e.g., vaccinations are the magical salvation science enlightened the world with).
- I also believe government officials like to defer the responsibility to “experts” because it removes their responsibility for making a bad decision.
On this point, one I believe Ron DeSantis must be acknowledged for that fact, that unlike everyone else who deferred to “the experts” during COVID-19, he did the opposite, looked at the data himself, came up with the policy that made the most sense, and then only solicited the help of an expert to make sure he had not made any mistakes. DeSantis took a lot of heat for how he managed COVID-19, but his response in Florida ultimately provided some of the best results seen in America. The only other Governor I know of who broke from the herd with with COVID-19 was Kristi Noem.
- Within the military, a group exists that is ideologically committed to developing countermeasures for dangerous bioweapons (e.g., look up the history of Fort Dietrich). I believe this is primarily because they are financially dependent upon these programs being well-funded for decades (which is easy to accomplish if a climate of fear exists around the bioweapon in question—the CDC uses a similar playbook). However, this commitment may also be due to lobbying from the private sector (which makes a lot of money off producing these countermeasures), or some people being ideologically fixated on continuing the programs.
- This group of “experts” has been able to convince the military’s leadership of the absolute necessity of their bioweapon countermeasures programs. Because of this lobbying, the military leadership has been willing to exert the full force of the military to push vaccinations through. This is important because many of the vaccines designed through this pipeline are unsafe, poorly (sometimes fraudulently) manufactured, and ineffective, to the point that even our relatively corrupt regulatory apparatus would not be willing to green-light them for civilian use.
When I observe how the government utilizes the tools available to it to solve a problem, I often find that when an effective and agreeable but complex and nuanced solution exists, the government will instead use a crude method with many shortcomings and make up for those shortcomings by putting the full force of the government behind that approach. This is why once widespread resistance in the military emerged towards the anthrax vaccine experiment, the Pentagon nonetheless doubled down on forcing it upon the military (as those “experts” had made the leadership believe this was a necessary sacrifice for national security). Likewise, I believe this is why the Pentagon went so far to gaslight those injured by the vaccines (along with hiding what they did from Congress).
If you consider what the anthrax vaccination campaign was seeking to accomplish, it’s very clear the wrong approach was chosen (a huge risk was taken on for a negligible benefit) and the fallout from the unethical conduct behind it (e.g., forced human experimentation) came at great cost to the military. Similarly, if you consider what has happened with the COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, all the same holds true.
In summary, I believe one of the critical steps for moving forward from this dysfunctional paradigm is to allow the decisions of “experts” to be debated within the public sphere.
Other Anthrax Vaccine Injuries
I consider the anthrax vaccine to be one of, and possibly the most, injurious vaccine in history (e.g., consider the recent comments on this Twitter thread). As so many were grievously injured by them, I cannot possibly share all of those injuries here. In addition to the pilot stories mentioned above, I will share a few stories I found particularly compelling:
Two other stories came from Captain Rovert, an Air Force medic and one of the servicemen stationed at Dover Airforce Base who tried to blow the whistle on what he saw happening after anthrax vaccination:
Ensuring airline safety is one of the things the American government excels in and it is something we rarely think about because we have gotten so used to it being done correctly we don’t notice how much work goes into ensuring it. In the last few years, however, a variety of somewhat unprecedented safety concerns have emerged in the airline industry. I believe many of these are reflective of the current dysfunction within the Department of Transportation (e.g., consider the disaster last year that stranded thousands during a winter storm, the massive backlog in California’s ports, and the recent catastrophic train derailment in Ohio).
Note: For those wishing to know more about the train derailment, this recent segment from a conservative news outlet, and this recent segment from a liberal news outlet (provided you remove their partisan talking points) provide an excellent summary of what is occurring there. Sadly, it will probably be a while before we fully understand the environmental and health consequences of this event. Additionally, the World War I reference Tucker Carlson made was due to a byproduct of burning polyvinyl chloride (one of the chemicals being transported by the train that was disposed of with a “controlled burn”). This byproduct, phosgene, was previously used as a chemical weapon during World War I and is now heavily regulated by the international chemical weapons treaty.
Recently there have been a few high-profile incidents of near misses in the aviation industry (along with a few unusual fatal crashes). Some of these are likely due to mechanical errors or general corruption superseding foundational safety regulations.
The recent story of Boeing’s 737 MAX, where a deadly autopilot function was placed into the planes without the pilot’s or FAA’s knowledge so that a plane Boeing needed to sell could make it to market, is one example. As Malcolm Kendrick astutely noted what happened with the 737 MAX mirrors many of the issues we now observe within the medical industry. Similarly, there is a good chance the train derailment we witnessed in Ohio could have been prevented with improved braking technologies, but despite this numerous presidential administrations from both political parties have simply come up with numerous excuses to avoid requiring the railroad industry to utilize them.
Fortunately, numerous public figures including Steve Kirsch and Tucker Carlson are beginning to bring public attention to this issue. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has not surprisingly adopted a similar tactic to the military (possibly in deference to the DoD), and despite numerous calls to address the issue, has simply stated the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and do not require additional investigation within the context of airline safety.
Two days ago, however, the FAA issued a very rare call to action:
Officially* this event is for discussing recent near misses that were unrelated to pilot impairment (although I could see why many of them in fact were). I suspect the broader issue motivating this sudden conference is the now widespread concerns about the effects of the vaccines on pilots. Although the conference next month has not yet been scheduled, I hope that when it occurs, enough concerned members of the public and aviation industry can attend it that the FAA is forced to at least acknowledge the elephant in the room: the effects of COVID vaccination on our pilots.
*There was one major event not discussed in the above article that is covered here.
Because of the importance of this story, I reached out to Dr. Malone and asked if he would share an article on it which he kindly agreed to do.
I have repeatedly observed cases where smaller demographics of people are severely injured by an unsafe pharmaceutical, and in each case, because it does not affect enough of the general population, it is possible for the injustice to be swept under the rug.
One of the most iconic poems from the Holocaust (that in many ways I live my life by) goes as follows:
I would argue that had we spoken out for the gay community when Fauci exploited them for his (and his sponsor’s) benefit during the early days of HIV, the disastrous COVID-19 playbook could not have been implemented. Similarly, had we spoken out more for the veterans injured by the anthrax vaccines, I do not believe that the COVID-19 response could have happened.
Given the extent to which the government and airlines typically go to ensure airline safety, it is astonishing that nothing has been done to protect the fitness of our pilots. However, if we take a step back to observe what happened throughout the military with the anthrax vaccines (which I would argue were a beta test by the Department of Defense for the COVID-19 response), this unwillingness to acknowledge the elephant in the room makes much more sense and I hope this helps any of you who decide to address the FAA on the subject. I thank you for your time in reading this and helping to bring attention to this forgotten medical tragedy.
This article was originally published on The Forgotten Side of Medicine.
Regards the Anthrax jab; we did some research on this and found figures of anywhere between 30-50,000 (most popular figure was 35K)…. dying from the jab within a few years; all covered up, by blaming something else.
Regards “Most government officials do not have a good understanding of scientific topics”…. unless people like you understand that this is deliberate and part of both UN Agenda 30 and the WEF – Great Reset; you will never understand the true intentions of this project – or agenda.
Anyway, good stuff and thanks, signed up and hope to read more of your articles.