Austrian doctors can now be held liable for vaccine injuries. This roots from the fact that a doctor is obligated to inform patients about the possible dangers and harmful consequences of the treatment.
Mag. Gerald Hauser, an Austrian lawmaker, recently grilled (read below) Johannes Rauch, the nation’s minister of health, on who is legally responsible for the COVID-19 vaccinations. According to Rauch’s comments, medical practitioners who obediently accepted the ministry’s “evidence-less” promises that the vaccinations were safe could very well be held accountable in the event that vaccination harm occurs.
In particular, the Minister of Health’s responses reveal that doctors would be obligated to provide appropriate information about the potential dangers and adverse repercussions of the injections in advance so that individuals might make a “informed and free decision.” If they do not comply, medical professionals may risk fines of up to 14,000 euros. Rauch went on to explain the ramifications for doctors, citing settled case law with the Austrian Supreme Court:
“The doctor is obligated to inform patients about the possible dangers and harmful consequences of the treatment. There is also an obligation to inform about vaccinations. Before the vaccination is carried out, there is an obligation to inform the person to be vaccinated and—if this [person] is not yet capable of making decisions— one with legal representation in the area of the person entrusted with care and upbringing (legal guardian, usually a parent) about the disease to be prevented and the vaccination so that they can give consent to the vaccination.”
Rauch, who imposed vaccinations for all Austrian citizens (and discreetly rescinded the requirement in late June), established that doctors must offer the information in order to defend the person’s decision-making freedom. People should be offered the information needed to comprehend the nature, significance, and extent of a medical action, including COVID-19 “vaccines,” according to Rauch. When asked what the implications are for doctors who fail to provide adequate information to their patients, Rauch responded:
“This question can only be answered to the effect that a lack of clarification [is] a violation of medical standards represent[ing] professional duties. This can be administrative and/or disciplinary, be punished, and result in legal liability consequences.”
The argument over the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines” between Hauser, a conservative member of the Freedom Party, and Rauch, a progressive member of the Green Alternative, is not new. If the patient has not been appropriately informed in advance about the possibly hazardous consequences of the injection, such as the numerous well-known and severe side effects, vaccine damage responsibility could fall on doctors, according to Wochenblick (WB) who reported it as early as June 2021. Hauser has reportedly emphasized “Vaccination is the problem, not the disease” numerous times, according to WB.
Hauser, who has advocated the use of ivermectin and said that the W.H.O. is dismantling democracy, also questioned Rauch about what training or information has been given to the physicians administering COVID injections so they can provide their patients accurate information. Rauch’s responses emphasize the enormous power the pharmaceutical business has over medical experts and the entire global healthcare system, as WB pointed out. Pfizer contributed more than 31 million euros to Austria’s healthcare system in 2020. Given Pfizer’s repeated history of hiding the severely detrimental consequences of the mRNA shots, it is logical to conclude there is a dearth of adequate information from big pharma regarding adverse events.
Rauch said that in addition to Pfizer’s financial infusion into Austria, 143 clinicians had attended training sessions on COVID-19 immunizations. Rauch claims that between 2020 and 2022, the Austrian Medical Association’s diploma further training program (DFP) held a total of 273 DFP training classes on the topic of “vaccination,” 143 of which focused explicitly on the COVID-19 doses. However, the program is supported by Sanofi, Merck, Johnson & Johnson, and other companies, according to DFP’s website. Consequently, the issue of the breadth of information provided on unfavorable vaccination outcomes continues, much like it did with Pfizer.
The cost of breaking the law’s requirement to disclose vaccination adverse (as dictated by the Medicines Act) effects is 7,500 euros, and if the violation is repeated, it can reach 14,000 euros, as vaccination status is rarely recorded in Austria. Nevertheless, according to WB, not a single notification regarding COVID vaccinations had been submitted, leaving numerous impacted people to independently report incidents. According to Hauser, a side effect is any unwanted, negative reaction to a vaccination, which for vaccines also includes the absence of an impact. Therefore, the following query is crucial:
“Is it already a reportable side effect if a gene-treated person subsequently becomes infected with corona and actually becomes ill—i.e., has a so-called vaccination breakthrough?”
Rauch reaffirmed that medical practitioners bear full responsibility and liability for the COVID shot and any side effects in additional questions on Hauser’s ten-page questionnaire. It is obvious that the Austrian Ministry of Health is forsaking doctors and leaving them to deal with any potential litigation that may arise, despite claims that the vaccinations are safe. How much longer can other countries, especially the massively propagandized United States, ignore the rising number of “vaccine” injuries and hold no one accountable now that the Austrian Health Minister has shifted liability to medical professionals?
Read the document below:
Support GreatGameIndia
