An American doctor from Wisconsin, Dr Sara Beltrán Ponce had a miscarriage just days after receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. The miscarriage happened just three days after she got the mRNA shot.
Must Watch: Would you live on 3D Printed Mars for a year for $60,000?
Dr Sara Beltrán Ponce COVID-19 Vaccine Miscarriage
Dr. Sara Beltrán Ponce graduated from the Medical College of Wisconsin in 2019. She is completing her residency in Radiation Oncology at the same Milwaukee college.
Her profile on a website called SheMD says she is “passionate about medical education, public health, and mentorship, particularly for women interested in radiation.”
She is married with one daughter and had another child on the way – until yesterday.
Dr. Beltrán Ponce tweeted on January 28 that she is 14 weeks pregnant and “fully vaccinated.”
She repeated many of the most common talking points related to COVID-19 and vaccines in the tweet chain.
She tweeted an update about her pregnancy less than a week later (NOTE: There is a narrative on social media channels about some sort of “fake photo” in Dr. Beltrán Ponce’s tweets. The narrative appears to attempt discrediting the story or deflecting from the facts. We’ve linked the internet archives herein for readers to see the actual tweets and screenshots).
The miscarriage happened at 14 1/2 weeks, indicating it was three days after she got the first or second mRNA shot. She did not say if it was the Pfizer or Moderna shot. Dr. Beltrán Ponce has since locked her Twitter account so only verified followers can see her tweets.
Petition against Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine trials
Dr. Michael Yeadon is the former Vice President and Chief Scientific Advisor at Pfizer. He and Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed a petition (read below) with the European Medicines Agency on December 1, 2020.
The petition asks the agency to halt trials for the Pfizer BioNTech BNT162b shot and all other mRNA trials until study designs conform with more universal methods.
One of their concerns involves Syncytin-1. The protein is responsible for placenta development during pregnancy.
Placentas provide oxygen and food to fetuses. They also eliminate waste from the baby. Syncytin-1 is “also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses,” according to the petition. The mRNA shots would thus inhibit or eliminate Syncytin-1, and prevent or obstruct pregnancy.
Further, according to Section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer BioNTech trial protocol, pregnant women or women who may become pregnant should not take the mRNA shots. Section 10.4.1 also warns men taking the mRNA shots to “be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse” and to not donate sperm.
Despite all these clear warnings, people are lining up and getting these shots to conform with social media and mainstream media norms. Medical professionals are not immune to said social pressures.
American Doctor Sara Beltrán Ponce From Wisconsin Has Miscarriage 3 Days After Getting COVID-19 VaccineCourtesy of The COVID Blog.
For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage.
Send in your tips and submissions by writing to us directly. Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates.
Support GreatGameIndia
There is nothing malignant in capitalism but the “merger of Government policies combined with crony capitalism is cancer that spreads .
The Ro ths child 1971 report spells out this malignancy in go ornament in R&D ( research and development which is loaded with conflict of interests and needs to be illgual and is under humanity constitutional laws and Nuremberg laws.
9 PagesPosted: 3 Aug 2016
Miles Parker
Reserve Bank of New Zealand
Date Written: August 2016
Abstract
In 1971, (Lord) Victor Rothschild, reported to Government on “The Organisation and Management of Government R&D” and how government could become (in his words) a customer for research contracted from the Research Councils and other sources. Rothschild’s thinking implied that management of R&D by “customer” Departments would bring an understanding of research outputs. He proposed the transfer of applied science funds from Research Councils to Government Departments, providing each with a Chief Scientist as proxy customer for research to be commissioned on a “customer/contractor” basis. The Government largely adopted his proposals in 1972 and implemented them in 1974. The Rothschild reforms and the upheavals they brought were controversial at the time, though now in some instances, reversed and otherwise either forgotten or buried in unconscious assumptions. However, the Rothschild framework still underpins important assumptions about Departmental relationships with the science community, which in my view adversely affected the access of Government to expert advice. From the viewpoint of a participant in Government R&D management through this period, I explore the immediate response and the post-1980 history of the Rothschild reforms, discuss the way in which research commissioning became such a heavy task as to impede analysis and advice delivery, and consider alternative approaches, such as the “science broker” model. This article is published as part of a collection on scientific advice to governments.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2817841
Move over RU-485, you now have competition in the form of Chicom virus vaccines!
COVID-19 is a crime against humanity. Listen to the people. https://peoplesinternationalcourtofjustice.org
because it is an experiment!!and if you see on the internet all the vaccine reactions you see how many people get very sick like shaking with their whole body24 seven and how that vaccin that they did not test wel also kills people!
Nothing better than for a eugenicist (in training or in spirit), like a freaking pro-vax oncologist to kill her OWN baby with the jabs!!!
I am sure that Bill Gates sent words of encouragement.