Citing several studies, Stephanie Seneff claims COVID vaccines may bring on an avalanche of neurological diseases and says the vaccine may be worse than the disease itself.
- EXPLOSIVE: Here’s what was uncovered in Hunter Biden’s iCloud Hack
- MAJOR PEER REVIEWED STUDY: Moderna Vaccine Increases Myocarditis Risk By 44 Times In Young Adults
- MUST READ: High Level International Bankers Simulate The Collapse Of Global Financial System
- BIG STORY: Wuhan Lab Isolated Monkeypox Strain In 2020
- EXPLOSIVE: Ukraine Biolabs Used Fever Carrying Mosquitoes To Spark Dengue Pandemic In Cuba
Stephanie Seneff, Ph.D., a prominent research scientist at MIT for over five decades, discusses the COVID-19 vaccinations. Her primary emphasis has been glyphosate and sulfur since 2008, but in the last year, she delved into the science of these innovative injections and wrote an excellent paper on the subject.
“To have developed this incredibly new technology so quickly, and to skip so many steps in the process of evaluating [its safety], it’s an insanely reckless thing that they’ve done,” she says. “My instinct was that this is bad, and I needed to know [the truth].
So, I really dug into the research literature by the people who’ve developed these vaccines, and then more extensive research literature around those topics. And I don’t see how these vaccines can possibly be doing anything good. When you weigh the good against the bad, I can’t see how they could possibly be winning, from what I’ve seen.”
Significant Death Toll Will Rise in Months and Years to Come.
Statistics from months into the vaccine program paint a bleak picture. Seneff cites research that shows deaths among those over 60 are 14.6 times more likely over the first 14 days after receiving their first COVID injection than those who aren’t. That is incredible. The full paper can be found here.
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
Other data reviewed in the video above reveal that general death rates have increased since COVID-19 vaccines were deployed, with the exception of a few places. Seneff, surprisingly, believes she has figured out why. Glyphosate is not used in nations where COVID-19 vaccines have not increased death rates.
“I immediately suspected glyphosate when I started to see COVID-19,” Seneff says. “I’ve written a book on glyphosate called ‘Toxic Legacy,’ and I have an entire chapter in that book on the immune system. Glyphosate, I believe, is a train wreck for the innate immune system, and when your immune system is weak, your body has to overreact to the virus. It can’t kill the virus.
So, it ends up [causing] collateral damage and wrecking your tissues. You get into this cytokine storm kind of situation where you destroy your lungs and you can’t cope. It’s not really the virus. It’s the immune reaction to the virus that’s killing you, and that’s because your immune system is too weak. If you have a strong innate immune system, I believe you wouldn’t even get symptoms from COVID-19.
When you look at the statistics on which countries are hit hard and just can’t get ahead of this virus, they’re clearly the countries that use a lot of glyphosate and developing biofuels based on glyphosate-exposed plants. So, I think that’s a critical piece of the puzzle as well. Glyphosate is in the atmosphere … [and] people are breathing it. So now you’re getting a direct attack on the lungs immune system, which makes you very susceptible to COVID.”
Seneff believes that the COVID-19 “vaccines” will kill far more people than the disease itself, and will actually worsen the disease. Seneff provides a frightening case study of a cancer patient in the United Kingdom who received 101 days of treatment for severe COVID-19.
They failed to treat him with antibody cocktails, and after his death, they discovered that the major SARS-CoV-2 variation in his body had a dozen distinct mutations in the spike protein. His body figured out a way to go around the antibodies, which is an important piece of the puzzle.
“I think vaccines are doing the same thing,” Seneff argues, noting that just 17 % of vaccinated persons with impaired immune systems create antibodies. Surprisingly, these people may have gotten the rough end of the deal. Because their immune function is inadequate, the antibodies may not work, allowing the virus to develop resistance and evolve.
“I think you have a lot of immune compromised people in a country where glyphosate is destroying people’s immune system, and that gives tremendous opportunity for the virus to mutate. The vaccine is going to accelerate that process because we’re vaccinating immune compromised people left and right.”
Vaccine Remedy May Be Worse Than the Disease
Seneff’s depiction of the spike protein as a metabolic toxin is significantly more detailed in her paper (pdf given below). The highlighted significant passages below, begin with how the spike protein can cause pathological damage in the lungs, heart, and brain:
“The picture is now emerging that SARS-CoV-2 has serious effects on the vasculature in multiple organs, including the brain vasculature … In a series of papers, Yuichiro Suzuki in collaboration with other authors presented a strong argument that the spike protein by itself can cause a signaling response in the vasculature with potentially widespread consequences.
These authors observed that, in severe cases of COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2 causes significant morphological changes to the pulmonary vasculature … Furthermore, they showed that exposure of cultured human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit was sufficient to promote cell signaling without the rest of the virus components.
Follow-on papers showed that the spike protein S1 subunit suppresses ACE2, causing a condition resembling pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a severe lung disease with very high mortality … The ‘in vivo studies’ they referred to … had shown that SARS coronavirus-induced lung injury was primarily due to inhibition of ACE2 by the SARS-CoV spike protein, causing a large increase in angiotensin-II.
Suzuki et al. (2021) went on to demonstrate experimentally that the S1 component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, at a low concentration … activated the MEK/ERK/MAPK signaling pathway to promote cell growth. They speculated that these effects would not be restricted to the lung vasculature.
The signaling cascade triggered in the heart vasculature would cause coronary artery disease, and activation in the brain could lead to stroke. Systemic hypertension would also be predicted. They hypothesized that this ability of the spike protein to promote pulmonary arterial hypertension could predispose patients who recover from SARS-CoV-2 to later develop right ventricular heart failure.
Furthermore, they suggested that a similar effect could happen in response to the mRNA vaccines, and they warned of potential long-term consequences to both children and adults who received COVID-19 vaccines based on the spike protein.
An interesting study by Lei et. al. (2021) found that pseudovirus — spheres decorated with the SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein but lacking any viral DNA in their core — caused inflammation and damage in both the arteries and lungs of mice exposed intratracheally.
They then exposed healthy human endothelial cells to the same pseudovirus particles. Binding of these particles to endothelial ACE2 receptors led to mitochondrial damage and fragmentation in those endothelial cells, leading to the characteristic pathological changes in the associated tissue.
This study makes it clear that spike protein alone, unassociated with the rest of the viral genome, is sufficient to cause the endothelial damage associated with COVID-19. The implications for vaccines intended to cause cells to manufacture the spike protein are clear and are an obvious cause for concern.
How Can You Protect Yourself From the Vaccine or Exposure to Those That Were Vaccinated?
That is, after all, the question of the day. We discussed about the vaccination shedding. Obviously, the vaccination does not normally cause individuals to shed viral particles, but it can easily induce people to shed spike proteins, which could cause just as much harm as the virus.
While Seneff’s article didn’t go into great detail on treatments, it did reveal that your body has the ability to resolve many of these issues through a process known as autophagy. This is the process of your body’s damaged proteins being removed.
Periodic fasting or time-restricted eating is one effective technique for increasing autophagy. The majority of people consume food for more than 12 hours every day. Slowly reducing this to a six- to eight-hour window will dramatically enhance metabolic flexibility and reduce insulin resistance.
Sauna therapy, which increases heat shock proteins, is another useful approach. Heat shock proteins act by refolding misfolded proteins. Damaged proteins are also identified and targeted for elimination.
Another important method is to avoid all processed vegetable oils (seed oils), which means avoiding almost all processed foods because they are high in them. Seed oils deplete mitochondrial energy production, cause oxidative stress, and harm your immune system.
Because glyphosate is widely used on the crops that generate seed oils, they are likely to contain it. Obviously, glyphosate contamination in all of your food must be avoided, which you can do by purchasing only certified organic goods.
Finally, you want to strengthen your innate immune system, and one of the greatest ways to do so is to get enough sun exposure in your bathing suit to raise your vitamin levels to 60 to 80 ng/ml (100 to 150 nmol/l).
Read Seneff’s paper below: