Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People

A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People
Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People

The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that

“if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.”

The court further notes that the cycle threshold used for the PCR tests currently being made in Portugal is unknown.

The threshold cycles used in PCR tests in India is between 37 and 40, which makes the reliability of the PCR test less than 3% and the false positive rate as high as 97%.

This case concerned the fact that four people had been quarantined by the Regional Health Authority. Of these, one had tested positive for COVID using a PCR test; the other three were deemed to have undergone a high risk of exposure. Consequently, the Regional Health Authority decided that all four were infectious and a health hazard, which required that they go into isolation.

Subscribe to GreatGameIndia

Success! An email was just sent to confirm your subscription. Please find the email now and click 'Confirm Follow' to start subscribing.

The court’s summary of the case to rule against the Regional Health Authority’s appeal reads as follows:

“Given how much scientific doubt exists — as voiced by experts, i.e., those who matter — about the reliability of the PCR tests, given the lack of information concerning the tests’ analytical parameters, and in the absence of a physician’s diagnosis supporting the existence of infection or risk, there is no way this court would ever be able to determine whether C was indeed a carrier of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, or whether A, B and D had been at a high risk of exposure to it.”

It is also important to remember PCR was invented as a way to create copies of genetic material. Its was never intended to be a diagnostic tool.

The standard coronavirus tests are throwing up a huge number of positive cases daily. These tests are done based on faulty WHO protocols which are designed to include false positives cases as well.

This fact about false positives of PCR Tests was first noted in public by Dr. Beda M. Stadler, a Swiss biologist, emeritus professor, and former director of the Institute of Immunology at the University of Bern.

So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Correct: Even if the infectious viruses are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].

Earlier, the WHO’s testing protocol was even questioned by Finland’s national health authority. WHO had called on countries to test as many patients as possible for coronavirus.

Finland ran out of testing capacity and began limiting coronavirus tests to the most vulnerable groups and healthcare personnel only. Finland’s national health authority said that testing people with mild symptoms would be a waste of healthcare resources.

In a startling disclosure, Finland’s head of health security, Mika Salminen dismissed WHO advisory saying the WHO doesn’t understand pandemics and that their Coronavirus testing protocol is illogical and doesn’t work.

So, if the WHO’s testing protocols are indeed based on the most reliable, accurate and well sourced technologies and research methodologies available worldwide, shouldn’t they have known about its negligible effectiveness and its impact in causing panic and chaos? Indeed the WHO knows it doesn’t work and moreover this is not the first time such criticisms have been voiced.

In the past in 2010, the WHO was caught faking a pandemic and was forced to admit that its methodology of measuring the virality or the spread of the disease, instead of its severity was incorrect.

For latest updates on the outbreak check out our Coronavirus Coverage.

Send in your tips and submissions by filling out this form or write to us directly at the email provided. Join us on WhatsApp for more intel and updates.

GreatGameIndia is a journal on Geopolitics and International Relations. Get to know the Geopolitical threats India is facing in our exclusive book India in Cognitive Dissonance. Past magazine issues can be accessed from the Archives section.

GreatGameIndia is being actively targeted by powerful forces who do not wish us to survive. Your contribution, however small help us keep afloat. We accept voluntary payment for the content available for free on this website via UPI, PayPal and Bitcoin.

Support GreatGameIndia

19 COMMENTS

  1. I’m not watching tv my self but I know wtf. Everything is a huge lie! The NWO do not care what people feel or think. They wanna put a wedge in between us from all times. They possesses us so bad that we barely think. Others who knows what’s a matter are ignored or are afraid to say what they really think. It’s never to late even they want us to gave up. Don’t test, don’t sell your souls. Don’t give up! Only together we can force them. Regards a mankind avatar.

  3. Thankyou for this. Given me some hope now that people will have to listen to FACT. we are all exhausted from trying to explain to people who are so brainwashed that they will NOT listen.

  4. well done to the Portuguese court and Finish Head of Health Security to call out the unreliability of the pcr testing kits. Next the outlawing of lockdown.

  5. Excellent work, well done Portugal for speaking out about what a lot already know. Hopefully other governments will realise they can’t keep this up, it’s time to end all this silliness, it’s costing too many lives.

  7. Yes more and more people are waking up to this BS – but incredibly there is still a significant majority who are still so docile that you would have to tap them on their shoulders to let them know you were ‘up them’ – some people are so compliant to authority it is staggering… it is the few that will have to save the many from themselves.

  10. Sounds interesting but it’s incomplete. What Portuguese Court ruled that the tests were not reliable? Where is the link to the ruling? By not giving this info you are playing into the hands of those horrible fact checkers who call every dissenting voice a “conspiracy theorist”. So please review this article and add the missing information.

  11. I have the evidence. I am a human rights and legal researcher specialising in Coronavirus. The name of the court is “Tribunal da Relação ” in Lisbon – I speak Portuguese and can help you if you have any questions.

  13. Please we need the court documentation. I can read Portuguese. This is being reported by a number of sites. I have done research on PCR and the data is true (high percentage of false positives if Ct > 35; some
    if say Ct > 33. Depends on who creates the test and what chemistry is being used.

  16. We need someone like you in Ireland, we are in the same situation. Big trouble. There is huge fraud going in our country John

  17. You got it. Tribunal da Relação is a, like we call here in Portugal, a “second instance” court. This means that if you go to a court and don’t agree with the judge’s decision, you may appeal for the case. The case is then analyzed at a second instance court (Tribunal da Relação) by a different type of judge called “Juiz Desembargador”. You can appeal a third and final time and the case will then be transferred to the final instance court. The Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal de Justiça) where the decision will be final and impossible to contest or alter.

Leave a Reply