Inside Afghanistan’s War On Opium

In 2024, Afghanistan is facing a second year of the Taliban’s poppy ban, significantly reducing poppy cultivation, though some areas like Badakhshan continue to resist, leading to violent clashes. Despite efforts to enforce the ban, including crop destruction, many farmers have turned to other crops or left their land fallow due to the lack of viable alternatives and economic hardships. The Taliban’s heavy-handed approach, coupled with ethnic tensions and the absence of non-farm job opportunities, has heightened unrest and could threaten the sustainability of the poppy ban, potentially fueling support for opposition groups.

Inside Afghanistan's War On Opium 1

Afghanistan’s Bold Move Against Poppy Cultivation: A Closer Look

This ban has led to a dramatic decrease in poppy cultivation, reaching historical lows. For example, by July 22, 2024, the main poppy-growing provinces had only 4,000 hectares of poppy fields, down from 16,000 hectares in 2023 and a massive 202,000 hectares in 2022 reports Alcis.

However, there are exceptions to this trend. In the remote northeastern province of Badakhshan, poppy cultivation continues despite the ban. Efforts to destroy the crops there have faced violent resistance, resulting in the deaths of both citizens and Taliban soldiers. The resistance is partly due to ethnic tensions, with local people feeling unfairly targeted by the predominantly Pashtoon Taliban authorities.

Inside Afghanistan's War On Opium 2
Figure 1: Map showing where and by how much poppy cultivation changed between 2022 and 2023. Red areas show a decrease in cultivation and green areas show an increase.

The Struggle in Badakhshan

The Taliban authorities are caught in a dilemma in Badakhshan. They want to show strength and enforce the poppy ban but fear increasing unrest and support for opposition groups. This has led to a compromise, allowing farmers to harvest most of their crops to avoid further conflict. However, this leniency might encourage other provinces to defy the ban as well.

Inside Afghanistan's War On Opium 3
Figure 2: Imagery analysis showing poppy cultivation around the airport and main road in Faizabad, Badakhshan.

Farmers in Badakhshan, unable to grow profitable cash crops or find alternative jobs, are sticking with poppy cultivation. The province’s harsh geography and small landholdings make it difficult to grow other crops. This situation threatens the sustainability of the poppy ban and could lead to further unrest and migration out of the area.

Badakhshan: A Potential Trendsetter?

In 2024, the Taliban had to take action against the persistent poppy cultivation in Badakhshan. In 2023, unlike other provinces, Badakhshan farmers continued to grow poppies, ignoring the ban. The local authorities did little to stop them, leading to violent resistance when eradication efforts were attempted.

Inside Afghanistan's War On Opium 4
Figure 3: Photo from social media and imagery showing the location of the Taliban’s ground spraying efforts in April 2024, on the outskirts of the city of Faizabad.

With few alternatives and high opium prices, Badakhshan farmers were likely to continue poppy cultivation. This defiance posed a challenge to the Taliban’s rule and their poppy ban. To address this, the Taliban replaced the local governor with a Pashtoon from Kandahar, Qari Mohammed Ayub Khalid, to enforce the ban more strictly.

Enforcing the Ban

Governor Khalid’s arrival marked the beginning of a more serious eradication campaign. Despite warnings, farmers continued planting poppies. When eradication began in March 2024, it faced violent resistance. Farmers protested and clashed with Taliban soldiers, leading to casualties on both sides.

The situation escalated in May 2024 when Taliban efforts to destroy poppy crops in certain villages sparked widespread protests. Thousands of people demonstrated, calling for the removal of Pashtoon soldiers and demanding compensation for destroyed crops and lost family members.

Inside Afghanistan's War On Opium 5
Figure 4: Map with photo insets showing the location of eradication and subsequent protests in Argo and Darayem.

A Compromise and a Show of Force

To calm the unrest, senior Taliban officials, including Prime Minister Mullah Hassan, negotiated with local elders. While some demands were met, like the withdrawal of Pashtoon soldiers from certain areas, the Taliban insisted on continuing eradication. This compromise allowed some crops to be saved, reducing the economic impact on farmers and preventing further violence.

High-resolution satellite images revealed that the eradication campaign was inconsistent, with many poppy fields left untouched. This partial destruction allowed farmers to retain some income while presenting the campaign as effective to the outside world. 

The Future of the Poppy Ban

Badakhshan’s farmers are in a tough spot. Their small landholdings and lack of alternatives make poppy cultivation their best option. Without significant economic support or alternative livelihoods, enforcing the poppy ban will be challenging and could lead to further unrest.

Inside Afghanistan's War On Opium 6
Figure 5: Imagery analysis of poppy eradication for central Argo, Badakhshan, 1st June 2021.
Inside Afghanistan's War On Opium 7
Figure 6: Imagery analysis of poppy eradication for central Faizabad, Badakhshan, 1st June 2021.
Inside Afghanistan's War On Opium 8
Figure 7: Graph showing an imagery-based assessment of the effectiveness of eradication efforts in central Argo and Faizabad as of 1 June 2024.

The Taliban needs to be cautious in handling Badakhshan. Alienating local commanders and pushing too hard on eradication could lead to increased support for opposition groups like the Islamic State Khorasan Province and the National Resistance Front. A moderated eradication effort, while publicly strict, might be the Taliban’s way of balancing enforcement with local realities.

Afghanistan’s poppy ban is fragile, particularly in Badakhshan, where cultivation remains high. While overall poppy cultivation has decreased dramatically across the country, the risk of resurgence is real. Sustainable alternatives are needed to support farmers and maintain the ban long-term.

Daily Counter-Intelligence Briefing Newsletter

We will send you just one email per day.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

 
Do you have a tip or sensitive material to share with GGI? Are you a journalist, researcher or independent blogger and want to write for us? You can reach us at [email protected].

Leave a Reply