In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court ruled that former presidents cannot be prosecuted for actions related to their official duties, asserting a presumption of immunity that shields them from criminal charges stemming from their presidential acts. The case, centered on Donald Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, will now return to lower courts to determine if the charges involve his personal conduct rather than official presidential responsibilities. The ruling, penned by Chief Justice John Roberts, emphasizes that while presidents are not above the law, prosecuting them for official actions could impede their decision-making while in office. This decision has sparked controversy and divided opinions about the limits of presidential immunity and its implications for future governance and accountability.
In a historic decision, a divided Supreme Court on Monday ruled that former presidents can never be prosecuted for actions relating to the core po...
Full Access
Included:
-
Access to All Articles.
-
One Plan. No Tiers.
-
No Ads.
-
Cancel anytime.
