The new VAERS data and analyses demonstrate that both reproductive-aged mothers and their infants have been damaged by accepting the vaccines. Further, according to VAERS analyses, COVID vaccines increase fetal abnormalities by hundredfold.
A team of physicians has called for a ban on the gene therapy COVID-19 vaccines in response to new unsettling pharmacovigilance signals from VAERS regarding the use of the COVID vaccines on women of reproductive age.
Dr. James Thorp, a specialist in maternal-fetal medicine, meticulously examined and validated the most recent Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data on COVID-19 vaccines and contrasted them to the influenza vaccines over the course of the previous two weeks.
“COVID-19 vaccines compared to the influenza vaccines are associated with increases in menstrual disorders, miscarriage, fetal chromosomal abnormalities, fetal cystic hygroma, fetal malformations, fetal cardiac arrest, fetal cardiac arrhythmias, fetal cardiac disorders, fetal vascular mal-perfusion abnormalities, abnormal fetal surveillance testing, abnormal fetal growth patterns, placental thrombosis, and fetal death,” Thorp stated.
The following are his findings:
Subscribe to GreatGameIndia
- Abnormal uterine bleeding (menstrual irregularity) is 1000-fold greater
- Miscarriages are 50-fold greater
- Fetal chromosomal abnormalities are 100-fold greater
- Fetal malformation is 50-fold greater
- Fetal cystic hygroma (a major malformation) is 90-fold greater
- Fetal cardiac disorders are 40-fold greater
- Fetal arrhythmia is 50-fold greater
- Fetal cardiac arrest is 200-fold greater
- Fetal vascular mal-perfusion is a 100-fold greater
- Fetal growth abnormalities are 40-fold greater
- Fetal abnormal surveillance tests are 20-fold greater
- Fetal placental thrombosis is 70-fold greater
Thorp said that he had a Department of Defense (DOD) statistics specialist who volunteered to help him under the condition of anonymity verify his study.
Lack of Safety Testing
Dr. Robert Malone, a leading proponent of mRNA technology, commented on the VAERS data in an interview: “The risky strategy of authorizing the emergency use of mRNA ‘vaccine’ products prior to completion of rigorous non-clinical animal testing for reproductive and genotoxicity risks, followed by advocacy of widespread use in pregnancy, now appears to have resulted in substantial and avoidable reproductive toxicity.”
“Prior non-clinical (animal model) data from the Pfizer Emergency Use Authorization data package, together with the absence of adequate data and testing of safety during pregnancy have resulted in avoidable reproductive and fetal toxicities,” Malone further noted.
He emphasized that both expecting moms and their newborns should not receive the “experimental” COVID immunizations.
“These new VAERS data and analyses demonstrate that both reproductive-aged mothers and their infants have been damaged by accepting unlicensed, inadequately tested, emergency use authorized genetic vaccines,” Malone said.
A VAERS analysis that was co-authored by Jessica Rose, Ph.D. earlier this year was removed by the academic publication Elsevier.
The media was informed by her that Thorp’s analysis completely agrees with hers.
“I do believe it is not only important, but necessary, to pull these products from pregnant/breastfeeding women and infants since there is no long-term safety data and the short-term data looks bad. As per both Moderna and Pfizer’s safety documents presented to VRBPAC pre-EUA granting for 0- 4-year-olds, this applies. They both showed terrible risk,” Rose said.
The analysis is supported by Christiane Northrup, MD, a fellow of the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
“Having been on the front lines of the DES disaster as a young OB/GYN, I am astounded that we are repeating the same kind of mistake but on a far more devastating level. COVID-19 shots must be stopped immediately in all pregnant women before further damage is done to the next generation,” Northrup said.
Thorp continued: “All of these adverse outcomes are statistically significant (p value < 0.0001)–in other words, the probability of these adverse outcomes occurring by chance alone is less than 1 in 10,000. It was incumbent upon the COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers, FDA, CDC, American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology to have demanded this safety data prior to pushing these dangerous ‘vaccines’ in pregnancy.”
“These institutions have violated the golden rule of pregnancy: new substances be it nutraceuticals, drugs, or vaccines have NEVER been allowed in pregnancy until long-term outcome data are available. Now, the COVID-19 vaccines make prior obstetrical disasters of diethyl stilbesterol (DES) and thalidomide look like prenatal vitamins. I am calling for a worldwide ban and moratorium on the use of any experimental gene therapy and/or COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ in pregnancy until long-term safety data are irrefutable,” Thorp stated.
According to medalerts.org, “The U.S. Government collects reports of adverse health events that follow the administration of a vaccine” and makes them publicly accessible in the VAERS database.
According to OpenVAERS, “VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System put in place in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% of vaccine injuries.”
The VAERS official disclaimer, however, states: “While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness.”