The Lancet drops a bombshell revelation saying that no independent, transparent, and science-based investigation has been carried out regarding the bioengineering of SARS-like viruses that was underway before the outbreak of COVID-19, suggesting COVID could have originated in US labs.
The Lancet appears to have made a 180-degree turn after giving EcoHealth Alliance head Peter Daszak’s massive “Natural Origins” Covid-19 misinformation campaign a platform, now suggesting Covid-19 may have originated “in US laboratories engaged in the laboratory manipulation of SARS-CoV-like viruses,” among other possibilities.
“No independent, transparent, and science-based investigation has been carried out regarding the bioengineering of SARS-like viruses that was underway before the outbreak of COVID-19,” writes The Lancet‘s Covid-19 commission, following two years of work.
“Independent researchers have not yet investigated the US laboratories engaged in the laboratory manipulation of SARS-CoV-like viruses, nor have they investigated the details of the laboratory research that had been underway in Wuhan. Moreover, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has resisted disclosing details of the research on SARS-CoV-related viruses that it had been supporting, providing extensively redacted information only as required by Freedom of Information Act lawsuits.”
Regular readers will recall that EcoHealth received a lucrative NIH contract to offshore the risky research to Wuhan, China, where he was tasked with modifying bat COVID to be more transmissible to humans, four months prior to the Obama administration outlawing “gain-of-function” research on US soil.
Daszak’s $14 million proposal to DARPA for “chimeric viruses, genetically enhanced to infect humans more easily” was turned down because it was deemed to be too dangerous.
Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St Georges, University of London, who struggled to get work published showing that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) had been carrying out “gain of function” work for years before the pandemic, said the research may have gone ahead even without the funding.
“This is clearly a gain of function, engineering the cleavage site and polishing the new viruses to enhance human cell infectibility in more than one cell line,” he said. –Telegraph
The Lancet published a screed by Daszak (signed by over two dozen scientists) after Sars-CoV-2 broke out in the same town where Daszak was manipulating Bat Covid. Daszak insisted that Covid could have only come from a natural spillover event, probably from a wet market, and that the scientists “stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.” Only afterwards did The Lancet mention Daszak’s conflicts of interest.
The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has “resisted disclosing the details of its work,” according to The Lancet’s Covid-19 Commission, which has now opened the door to various new possibilities. One of these is that Covid-19 may have been created in US laboratories or may have escaped from them.
The full section in question:
As of the time of publication of this report, all three research-associated hypotheses are still plausible: infection in the field, infection with a natural virus in the laboratory, and infection with a manipulated virus in the laboratory. No independent, transparent, and science-based investigation has been carried out regarding the bioengineering of SARS-like viruses that was underway before the outbreak of COVID-19. The laboratory notebooks, databases, email records, and samples of institutions involved in such research have not been made available to independent researchers. Independent researchers have not yet investigated the US laboratories engaged in the laboratory manipulation of SARS-CoV-like viruses, nor have they investigated the details of the laboratory research that had been underway in Wuhan. Moreover, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) has resisted disclosing details of the research on SARS-CoV-related viruses that it had been supporting, providing extensively redacted information only as required by Freedom of Information Act lawsuits.
In brief, there are many potential proximal origins of SARS-CoV-2, but there is still a shortfall of independent, scientific, and collaborative work on the issue. –The Lancet
The Covid-19 Commission chair, economist Prof. Jeffrey Sachs, said at a conference in Madrid earlier this year that he was “pretty convinced” Covid-19 “came out of a US lab of biotechnology, not out of nature,” a claim supported by Chinese diplomats. As The Telegraph notes, the Lancet report comes amid controversy surrounding this statement.
Also in August, Sachs participated in a podcast hosted by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has come under fire for his outspoken anti-vaccine views.
“Sachs’ appearance on RFK Jr’s podcast… undermines the seriousness of the Lancet Commission’s mission to the point of completely negating it,” said Prof Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization in Canada. “This may be one of the Lancet’s most shameful moments regarding its role as a steward and leader in communicating crucial findings about science and medicine,” she added.
After disbanding an initial task team led by Daszak that was never reconvened, Sachs maintained by his previous statements, telling The Telegraph that he personally “oversaw this aspect of the work” on the urgency of Sars-Cov-2.
“Everybody has signed off on the final text. The question of a possible laboratory release mostly involves the question of US-China joint work that was underway on Sars-like viruses,” he said.
According to the Lancet Commission report, the World Health Organization “repeatedly erred on the side of reserve rather than boldness” in the early stages of the pandemic, including a delay in declaring a public health emergency and a “hesitance” to report that Covid spread via airborne transmission.
The UN health agency also “fell victim to the increasing tensions between the United States and China”, the commissioners warned, adding that better international collaboration will be key to prevent epidemics becoming pandemics in future.
The WHO said it welcomed “the overarching recommendations”, but said there were “several key omissions and misinterpretations” around the agency’s initial response.
The researchers analysed the varying approaches to the disease around the world, too. The Western Pacific “stands out for its very low average mortality rate,” possibly as the region’s experience of the Sars epidemic in 2003 had left it better prepared to tackle new pathogens. -The Telegraph
As the scientific evidence regarding Covid-19 evolved, the journal “regularly evaluated the work of each Task Force to ensure that the final peer-reviewed report will provide valuable new insights to support a coordinated, global response to Covid-19 as well as to prevent future pandemics and contain future disease outbreaks,” according to a Lancet spokesperson.
Support GreatGameIndia
Aren’t we putting the cart before the horse here? Please show me the evidence of the so-called covid virus being isolated (purified) and proven to make an otherwise healthy person ill with the same symptoms.
Then we can talk about who might have manufactured the “virus”. Until then, what’s “manufactured” are all these virus-bioengineered-in-a-lab stories.
Official Biochemical and Statistical Evidence 100% confirms Moderna created Covid-19 patented in 2013
Covid-19 means: 19 nucleotide sequence and not 2019 at all.
By The Exposé on March 3, 2022
Evidence has emerged which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the pharmaceutical giant Moderna, the company that has made billions through the sale of an experimental Covid-19 injection, actually created the Covid-19 virus.
They cited a Paper by Scientists in India, Switzerland, Italy and the US (cautiously entitled: MSH3 Homology and Potential Recombination Link to SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site) in which they calculated that the chances of a 19 nucleotide sequence patented by Moderna randomly appearing in Covid-19 in circumstances where it does not appear anywhere else in nature are 1 in 3 trillion.
Furthermore they did not merely apply for a patent on 2016 February 4 with US9587003B2: as reported in the Daily Mail. They actually applied on 2013 December 16 for 4 patents with US9149506B2, US9216205B2, US9255129B2, US9301993B2:as well.
So Moderna had developed the 19 nucleotide gene sequence containing the Furin Cleavage Site which gives Covid19 its infectivity to humans VIRUS, by patented gain of function research, as early as 2010 to 2013.
Covid-19 was not made in 2019. It was made from the 19 nucleotide Moderna specific chimeric (CGG for AGA) furin cleavage site VIRUS which does not occur anywhere in nature. And every Covid death and every Covid vaccine death is parked squarely on the doorstep of ModeRNA and The Covid19 makers, the genetic vaccine makers. their funders and their promoters, which include almost every government and public sector and health service in the world, are therefore guilty of Genocide and crimes against humanity. They have pushed genetic rape and sickness and death onto half of the population of the world in order to enrich the pockets of Pharmaceutical Companies. Governments and Public sectors around the world have abandoned their health service regulation to billionaires and heartless corporations (me: and to make we humans, Trans Humans and now, the vaccinated, without any human rights whatsoever
The Expose
Moderna files lawsuit against Pfizer and BioNTech over COVID vaccine technology (TODAY)
(competitor’s vaccine infringes on “patents (for patented synthetic mRNA) that Moderna filed between 2010 and 2016”)
Follow the patents – 2010 and 2016 – so Moderna new about Covid as early as 2010 – to be able to come up with the Covid Vaccine Technology in the first place, from as early as 2010 – which goes hand in hand with the 2013 US Supreme Court Law making synthetic mRNA technology patentable, as it has been and those taking it, no longer human, but trans human and all human rights are lost = zero rights now for trans humans!! – so Moderna created and released the Covid-19 virus and they produced the synthetic mRNA vaccines to combat it, those patented between 2010 and 2016 – Do you all agree?
Moderna seeking compensation including royalties, damages
Updated: 7:32 AM PDT Aug 26, 2022
Moderna is suing its chief competitor in the COVID-19 vaccine space, alleging that Pfizer and BioNTech stole key technology used in the development of that group’s inoculation.
Both Moderna and the Pfizer-BioNTech partnership created vaccines based on messenger RNA technology, which teaches the body’s immune system to target a specific protein found on a virus. In the case of the coronavirus, both targeted the spike protein extending out from the surface of the virus.
The Massachusetts-based company alleges that its competitor’s vaccine infringes on patents that Moderna filed between “2010 and 2016”.
“We are filing these lawsuits to protect the innovative (synthetic) mRNA technology platform that we pioneered, invested billions of dollars in creating, and patented during the decade preceding the COVID-19 pandemic, (A decade is 10 years so 2010 +10 = 2020, bang on when vaccines were first released under Trump’s Emergency Protocol) Moderna Chief Executive Officer Stéphane Bancel said in a statement provided by the company. “This foundational platform, which we began building in 2010, along with our patented work on coronaviruses in 2015 and 2016, enabled us to produce a safe and highly effective COVID-19 vaccine in record time after the pandemic struck.”
Moderna, which developed its vaccine with support from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, was the first to begin testing its vaccine in humans. *That first shot was given at the Kaiser Permanente Washington Research Institute in Seattle in March of 2020. Pfizer announced its first clinical trial began in May.
Pfizer and BioNTech, however, was the first to receive emergency authorization in the United States and was also the first to be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
The Expose