Credit ratings play a huge role in the financial world. They help investors, both big institutions and regular individuals, understand how likely it is that a country or company will be able to repay its debts. When it comes to bonds and other forms of debt, credit ratings give investors confidence—or make them worry—about whether they’ll get their money back. However, African nations often face challenges because the credit ratings they receive from Western agencies are not always fair.

According to Dr. Misheck Mutize, a leading expert on credit ratings for the African Union (AU), there’s solid evidence that the way these ratings are calculated and analyzed is biased against Africa. He believes that the methods used by Western agencies often paint a more negative picture than the reality, which leads to harmful outcomes for African economies.
Dr. Mutize explains that many global investors rely heavily on these rating agencies when making decisions about investing in Africa. Unfortunately, when these ratings are too harsh or overly pessimistic, it scares off investors. This causes African countries to face higher interest rates when borrowing money, even though Africa has one of the lowest rates of countries defaulting on their debt. In other words, many African nations are actually very responsible about repaying their loans, but the ratings don’t reflect that truth.
In response to this issue, there has been an ongoing discussion within the AU about creating an alternative rating agency that could fairly assess African countries. In fact, since 2020, the AU has been exploring the idea of joining forces with BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) to establish an independent credit rating agency. This new agency would focus on the Global South, meaning regions like Africa and other developing areas, offering a more balanced and accurate view of their economies and risks.
Dr. Mutize emphasizes that for such an agency to succeed, it must be completely independent. That means it can’t be influenced by any government, political group, or big corporation. If it is truly neutral, the agency could offer unbiased opinions that investors would trust. He warns that if the agency seems politically driven or created to favor certain countries, investors would likely lose trust in it, which would defeat the entire purpose.
His message is clear: Africa needs a credit rating system that reflects its true potential, not one shaped by outdated or biased perceptions. If such an independent agency were created, it could open new doors for African nations, allowing them to grow their economies without the heavy burden of unfairly high borrowing costs. This move could transform how the world views Africa as an investment opportunity, leading to more prosperity across the continent.